[sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-algebra] Re: Introducing a framework for is_* methods

2010-10-25 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Dear Simon, On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 02:34:53PM -0700, Simon King wrote: As you may have noticed, I posted on sage-devel and asked if there is interest in the automatic dynamical update of categories, at the expense of slowing down sage -testall -long by 1.5%. I could imagine that many

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Posets in Sage

2010-10-25 Thread Christian Stump
Whereas points 2) and 3) are ok, point 1) seems to be broken right now. I hope, the bug is solved. Could you please recheck. I also moved all recent work on posets by Franco and myself together... Christian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] error in queue

2010-10-25 Thread Anne Schilling
I am not an expert with that. It seems to me that you added a new module in a new folder. I am not sure it fix fix your problem but you should try to declare this new folder (if it is the case) in /sage/devel/sage-combinat/sage/setup.py Look at the lines around line 790 and add your folder there.

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Posets in Sage

2010-10-25 Thread Christian Stump
Salut, ok, order ideal now works. But my procedure order_ideal_lattice is still broken. Here is where the problem sits: B = Posets.BooleanLattice(4) B.order_ideal(B.antichains()[1]) This does not work. Should not we be able to take the order ideal of an antichain ? Can you check if

[sage-combinat-devel] sage notebook

2010-10-25 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi, Sage-combinat might not be the right place to ask this: I just gave a number theory lecture and did a demonstration using the sage notebook. However, since the classroom had no internet access and I had started the session in my office (using sage installed on my laptop), it then complained