Ok, great. I'll start working on a patch and reply here again when
it's on the trac server.
--
Benjamin Jones
University of Wisconsin-Stout
jone...@uwstout.edu
benjaminfjo...@gmail.com
On Jan 31, 2:17 pm, Daniel Bump wrote:
> > I don't know if it's helpful to post so much code, but here is my c
On 2/1/11 8:42 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 06:50:53AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
Thank you. Does your patch depend on other patches in the sage-combinat queue?
I think the answer is yes, since moving it in the series file to before
the crystal patches gives an error. W
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 06:50:53AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Thank you. Does your patch depend on other patches in the sage-combinat queue?
> I think the answer is yes, since moving it in the series file to before
> the crystal patches gives an error. Which ones? Would you include them
> into
On 2/1/11 5:00 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 04:31:03AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
Could you open a trac ticket for it so I can refer to it?
Done: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10723
Thank you. Does your patch depend on other patches in the sage-combinat
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 04:31:03AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Could you open a trac ticket for it so I can refer to it?
Done: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10723
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil"
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You recei
On 2/1/11 4:02 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 02:21:14AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
How quickly could you get the graphs_color_by_label-nt.patch polished and
merged?
In principle, it should be just an hour or two of work. So it's all
about prioritizing it with the rest
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 02:21:14AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> How quickly could you get the graphs_color_by_label-nt.patch polished and
> merged?
In principle, it should be just an hour or two of work. So it's all
about prioritizing it with the rest of the backlog. In other words:
adding a dep
On 1/29/11 2:13 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 05:11:13AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
Following your suggestions I uploaded a new patch which addresses the
issues of representation and latex methods for spin crystals.
They now have a new method _repr_ using the signature r
