Salut,
I worked recently on the pickle jar #10354. It needs review. If we are
many changing it at the same time, I guess it may cause trouble... If
it's the case, let's talk and have a good strategy...
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10354
Since it is the first time I am changing the p
Here are some comments on #10744.
Very nice!
I do have some comments.
sage: A2=WeylCharacterRing("A2",style="coroots")
sage: a2=WeightRing(A2)
sage: rp=a2(A2(2,1))
sage: rp.plot()
Frequently one will want to call this for the character of
a representation. It would be good if one could:
A2(2,
Oops, I am so sorry. This mail was only meant to be sent to sage-devel
and sage-combinat-devel. Please moderate if still at all possible.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 06:44:11PM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 04:51:14AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> > For #8911 the new pickl
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 04:51:14AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> For #8911 the new pickle jar was just attached. So I added this file
> to #10632. Probably you can do the same for #7922 (but then the tickets
> might not commute if both change the pickles).
Yeah, that pickle jar procedure is not p
I am returning to the question of timing issues with #7922.
I recall that for a variety of branching rules, I ran tests
with and without the test, and obtained the following
results:
Old Code48 seconds
New Code25 seconds
Old Code, cache=true18 seconds
This is
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 02:59:56PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> >That being said, this could advocate for keeping CrystalOfTableaux as
> >a class (using the classcall trick as we had discussed) in order to
> >maintain backward compatibility on pickles (beside the other
> >advantages). Anne: I can
Hi Doug,
Welcome to the Sage community!
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 01:02:10PM +0800, D. S. McNeil wrote:
> (2) No kwarg constraints in Partitions/Compositions should be mutually
> exclusive. (I think there's a ticket for this but I can't find it
> now.)
>
> Partitions(15,length=5, parts_in
