If your objects really include h and w, so are in a box, I am
not sure I agree with the name 'weak partitions'.
PartitionsInABox or BoundedParitions?
Yes they do include h and w. The name PartitionInBox is already taken:
sage: PartitionsInBox(3,2).list()
[[], [1], [1, 1], [1, 1, 1], [2], [2, 1]
Hi Anne,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:57:45AM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> >>If your objects really include h and w, so are in a box, I am
> >>not sure I agree with the name 'weak partitions'.
> >>PartitionsInABox or BoundedPartitions?
> >
> >Yes they do include h and w. The name PartitionInBox
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 06:33:56PM -0400, Jason Bandlow wrote:
> Ah, I had seen your first message, but not your second. Thanks for
> reporting this--now I at least know it's not just me.
In principle, this is fixed now, both on 4.6.1 and 4.6.2.
There were two issues:
- Mike's permutation grou
Martin Rubey writes:
> Great! Unfortunately, it is quite likely that I won't be able to
> connect my notebook to the internet before monday...
OK, I tried just now, but did not succeed. I followed
http://wiki.sagemath.org/combinat/MercurialStepByStep#Creatingandcontributingpatches
already t
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 09:37:44AM +0100, Martin Rubey wrote:
> already the first step
>
> sage -combinat update -f
>
> failed with
>
> applying trac_8359-coxeter-groups-permutation-nt.patch
> patching file sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 321
> 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- sa
> - Christian's patch for latex_prefix in CombinatorialFreeModule had
> been removed since it was merged into #9370. The removal broke the
> root system patch which depended on it. To fix that, I just
> imported #9370 into the queue.
So it was (at least partially) my fault - thanks Nicolas
Dear Nicolas & Jason,
I think it worked now. Could you please let me know whether I made any
mistakes - I guess I did since it's my first commit...
Martin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send emai
Hi Martin,
How did you add the patch? Using
hg qnew sf_principal_specialization-mr.patch
at some point? I can see the patch, but it does not appear in the
series file, so it is not applied. You could change this by editing
the series file in /sage-combinat/.hg/patches and adding the name
of yo
Martin Rubey writes:
> Dear Nicolas & Jason,
>
> I think it worked now. Could you please let me know whether I made any
> mistakes - I guess I did since it's my first commit...
(I'd like to add: I just opened another ticket, #10931, concerning
combinatorial species, but I'll wait with pushing i
Anne Schilling writes:
> Hi Martin,
>
> How did you add the patch? Using
>
> hg qnew sf_principal_specialization-mr.patch
>
> at some point?
yes. and then I did
cd $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage-combinat/.hg/patches
sage -hg commit sf_principal_specialization-mr.patch
sage -hg push
> I can see the pa
On 3/14/11 3:37 AM, Martin Rubey wrote:
Anne Schilling writes:
Hi Martin,
How did you add the patch? Using
hg qnew sf_principal_specialization-mr.patch
at some point?
yes. and then I did
cd $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage-combinat/.hg/patches
sage -hg commit sf_principal_specialization-mr.patch
sa
Anne Schilling writes:
> Ah! You should stay in the directory you are working in (or somewhere in the
> sage-cominbat/ tree). From there do
>
> hg qrefresh
>
> This applies the changes you made in the file to your patch. The
>
> hg qcommit sf_principal_specialization-mr.patch
>
> which commits yo
On 3/14/11 4:04 AM, Martin Rubey wrote:
Anne Schilling writes:
Ah! You should stay in the directory you are working in (or somewhere in the
sage-cominbat/ tree). From there do
hg qrefresh
This applies the changes you made in the file to your patch. The
hg qcommit sf_principal_specialization
Hi Florent,
Is there a reason that your objects cannot be Elements of the Parent
PartitionsInBox? I.e, each object would be an instance of PartitionInBox?
This seems to be the most natural to me, but maybe I'm missing something.
Jason
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
On 03/14/2011 06:06 AM, Christian Stump wrote:
> So it was (at least partially) my fault - thanks Nicolas for fixing it!
Yes, thanks Nicolas!
-Jason
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sa
Anne Schilling writes:
> Ok, if you are just committing the series file, you should be in the directory
> /sage-combinat/.hg/patches
>
> From there
>
> sage -hg commit series
>
> (sometimes you need to remove series~ and other files that might have gotten
> created whilst editing).
>
> Is this w
Anne,
it seems that
devel/sage-combinat
hg qcommit .hg/patches/series
worked. Could you please check?
Thanks,
Martin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegro
Hi Jason,
> Is there a reason that your objects cannot be Elements of the Parent
> PartitionsInBox? I.e, each object would be an instance of PartitionInBox?
>
> This seems to be the most natural to me, but maybe I'm missing something.
I think you are indeed missing something:
I consider
On 3/14/11 4:57 AM, Martin Rubey wrote:
Anne,
it seems that
devel/sage-combinat
hg qcommit .hg/patches/series
worked. Could you please check?
Did you do
hg push
from devel/sage-combinat/.hg/patches ?
Currently I cannot see your change and there has not been a
recent push by you.
Best,
A
Anne Schilling writes:
> On 3/14/11 4:57 AM, Martin Rubey wrote:
>> Anne,
>>
>> it seems that
>>
>> devel/sage-combinat
>> hg qcommit .hg/patches/series
>>
>> worked. Could you please check?
>
> Did you do
>
> hg push
>
> from devel/sage-combinat/.hg/patches ?
> Currently I cannot see your chang
On 3/14/11 5:30 AM, Martin Rubey wrote:
Anne Schilling writes:
On 3/14/11 4:57 AM, Martin Rubey wrote:
Anne,
it seems that
devel/sage-combinat
hg qcommit .hg/patches/series
worked. Could you please check?
Did you do
hg push
from devel/sage-combinat/.hg/patches ?
Currently I cannot see
On 03/14/2011 08:02 AM, Florent Hivert wrote:
> 1 - usual partition. It is useful in many place of the literature to consider
> the set of partition which are inside a given box. They are counted by
> binomial coefficient.
>
> 2 - generalized partitions where empty row and columns are allowed. T
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 08:59:37AM -0400, Jason Bandlow wrote:
> On 03/14/2011 08:02 AM, Florent Hivert wrote:
> > 1 - usual partition. It is useful in many place of the literature to
> > consider
> > the set of partition which are inside a given box. They are counted by
> > binomial coefficient.
On 03/14/2011 09:14 AM, Florent Hivert wrote:
>> So these these objects are the disjoint union of the partitions in the
>> boxes (h,w) for h + w = some fixed n ?
>
> Yes ! With an emphasis on *disjoint union*.
OK, good, I understand now. If you are considering a new element class,
it seems to me
Anne Schilling writes:
>> cd $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage-combinat/.hg/patches
>> sage -hg commit sf_principal_specialization-mr.patch
>> sage -hg push
>
> Ah! You should stay in the directory you are working in (or somewhere in the
> sage-cominbat/ tree). From there do
>
> hg qrefresh
>
> This applies
Dear tableaux users,
I have (finally!) posted a patch on the queue for trac #9265. This
converts the file tableau.py to use the modern Parent/Element model with
categories. Some highlights:
* Tableau_class no longer exists. If you want to test if something is a
Tableau, you should u
cd $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage-combinat/.hg/patches
sage -hg commit sf_principal_specialization-mr.patch
sage -hg push
Ah! You should stay in the directory you are working in (or somewhere in the
sage-cominbat/ tree). From there do
hg qrefresh
This applies the changes you made in the file to your pa
27 matches
Mail list logo
