On 3/30/11 6:06 AM, Martin Rubey wrote:
Anne Schilling writes:
sage: t = Tableau([[1,1,3],[2,3]])
sage: L = LinearExtension((t, 2))
sage: L.promotion()
[[1,1,2],[2,3]]
Usual semistandard tableaux are already defined on a totally ordered
alphabet {1,2,...,n+1}. So in this case, it would not a
Hi Dan, Nicolas, Jean, Jason, Martin, ...
This is now implemented. I also added a section on the Lusztig involution
to the thematic tutorial. Everything is posted on trac and the sage-combinat
server. Hopefully this is now close to being finished!
Best,
Anne
On 3/29/11 11:51 PM, Nicola
> the thematic tutorial.
>
> Since this method should eventually be moved to root systems (if not
> in DynkinDiagram!), I would not advertise it at this point. Or did you
> mean doc about the Sch�tzenberger involution?
I meant the Schutzenberger and Lusztig involutions.
Dan
--
You received th
Anne Schilling writes:
>> sage: t = Tableau([[1,1,3],[2,3]])
>> sage: L = LinearExtension((t, 2))
>> sage: L.promotion()
>> [[1,1,2],[2,3]]
>
> Usual semistandard tableaux are already defined on a totally ordered
> alphabet {1,2,...,n+1}. So in this case, it would not add much.
Yes, it only give
Hi Martin,
On 3/30/11 2:04 AM, Martin Rubey wrote:
Martin Rubey writes:
"Nicolas M. Thiery" writes:
As for posets, I don't know. I would tend to first write a draft of
the method in Posets, and then decide if the interfaces and
implementations are similar enough to be shared or not.
Here
On 30 Mrz., 11:21, Simon King wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Under what conditions is the parent method __init_extra__ executed?
Solution: In the example in question,
sage.structure.parent.Parent.__init__ was not called. There,
__init_extra__ would be dealt with.
--
You received this message because you are
Hi!
Under what conditions is the parent method __init_extra__ executed?
With #9944 and #9138,
sage: R. = QQ['t'][]
seems to properly initialise its category. One has
sage: isinstance(R,Algebras(QQ['t']).parent_class)
True
However, not a single __init_extra__ is executed, although it *shoul
Martin Rubey writes:
> "Nicolas M. Thiery" writes:
>
>> As for posets, I don't know. I would tend to first write a draft of
>> the method in Posets, and then decide if the interfaces and
>> implementations are similar enough to be shared or not.
>
> Here goes:
> # http://www.combinatorics.org/V
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:42:42AM +0200, Martin Rubey wrote:
> "Nicolas M. Thiery" writes:
> > `hg log` in .hg/patches or browsing
> > http://combinat.sagemath.org/patches/ ?
>
> Hm, I tried this but it doesn't do what I want, it only reports the
> status of the repository on my computer. The p
"Nicolas M. Thiery" writes:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 08:21:03AM +0200, Martin Rubey wrote:
>> 2) what can I do just to check whether something changed, without
>> applying the patches? I tried hg pull and hg incoming but that didn't
>> report any changes...
>
> `hg log` in .hg/patches or browsi
10 matches
Mail list logo
