Re: [sage-combinat-devel] posets...

2011-04-22 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 06:03:45PM +0200, Florent hivert wrote: > I just created a poset using the new category. It seems to work except for > > sage: TestSuite(poset).run() > [...] > AssertionError: Not implemented method: antichains > -

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] posets...

2011-04-22 Thread Christian Stump
Hi Florent, > I just created a poset using the new category. It seems to work except for > >    sage: TestSuite(poset).run() >    [...] >    AssertionError: Not implemented method: antichains >     >    The following tests failed: _test_n

[sage-combinat-devel] posets...

2011-04-22 Thread Florent Hivert
Hi there, I just created a poset using the new category. It seems to work except for sage: TestSuite(poset).run() [...] AssertionError: Not implemented method: antichains The following tests failed: _test_not_i

[sage-combinat-devel] Dyck words

2011-04-22 Thread Florent Hivert
Hi Mike, I'm currently working on Dyck words and I was wondering if you have any objections if I fold the following patch of yours in my patch in order to submit the whole shortly. dyck_words_coparen_mz.patch dyck_wordsdinv_mz.patch Cheers, Florent -- You received this message because

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] updated series file

2011-04-22 Thread Anne Schilling
On 4/22/11 3:49 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 07:49:34PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote: On 4/17/11 9:59 AM, Florent Hivert wrote: You should'nt simply disable them but add a guard against 4.7.1 with a note needs rebase (as #-4_7_1 # needs-rebase). Actually: #+4_7 # needs-

[sage-combinat-devel] slowdown of the gap (and others?) communication caused by a missconfiguration in ubuntu

2011-04-22 Thread Christian Stump
Salut, Nicolas pointed me to a missconfiguration in ubuntu, see http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/5db90b3681e7dbcb/e2fde09f672c83fb?lnk=gst&q=sandpile#e2fde09f672c83fb. This causes extreme slowdowns on ubuntu machines, here is an examples run on ubuntu and on mac for

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] updated series file

2011-04-22 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 07:49:34PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote: > On 4/17/11 9:59 AM, Florent Hivert wrote: > >You should'nt simply disable them but add a guard against 4.7.1 with a note > >needs rebase (as #-4_7_1 # needs-rebase). Actually: #+4_7 # needs-rebase The patch do not apply starting fr

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] updated series file

2011-04-22 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Hello, > skipping separatrix_diagram-vd.patch - guarded by '-4_7_1' > applying translation_surface_homology-vd.patch > unable to find 'sage/dynamics/flat_surfaces/separatrix_diagram.py' for > patching That's normal because translation_surface_homology-vd.patch depends on separatrix_diagram-vd.pat

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] finite complex reflection groups and matrices over the universal cyclotomic field

2011-04-22 Thread Jean MICHEL
Dear Christian, On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:00:15PM -0400, Christian Stump wrote: > thanks a lot, I will try it today and check that everything works. Hum.. No. I have either to prepare a chevie.tar.gz or a new gap3-jmxx.tar.gz, and you have to know how to use it. Which one do you prefer? Also