Hi!
What's the problem with raising a NotImplementedError for a method
that is not implemented? Why should one want that these methods are
"deactivated"? What shall "deactivated" actually mean? That they don't
appear in introspection?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to th
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:07 AM, Bruce wrote:
>
> and I expected AlgebrasWithFiniteBasis as well.
See FiniteDimensionalAlgebrasWithBasis.
Franco
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to s
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:45:57AM -0700, Christian Stump wrote:
> suppose, there is an abstract method(optional=True) in a category, and
> this method is not implemented in a concrete class using this
> category. Is there a way to automatically deactivate all further
> methods in the category usin
Salut,
suppose, there is an abstract method(optional=True) in a category, and
this method is not implemented in a concrete class using this
category. Is there a way to automatically deactivate all further
methods in the category using this abstract method?
The problem, I just encountered, is:
Th
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:09:55AM -0700, tom d wrote:
>
> :/mnt/data/sage-4.6.2/devel/sage-combinat$ sage -hg qselect -s
> guards in series file:
> 1 +4_1_2
> 2 -4_3_1
...
>
> info("Updating guards")
> system(hg+" qselect -q -n")
> system(hg+" qselect "+
>" ".join(non_ve
Hi!
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 09:05:10AM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> For the record, Chris Berg and I had trouble with this patch last week at the
> Sage Days:
>
> This patch breaks the tests in IwahoriHeckeAlgebra
>
> categories-root_system-6588.patch
Ah right. Christian: since you c
On 5/12/11 9:00 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:30:04AM -0400, Christian Stump wrote:
Is it okay, if I move categories-root_system-6588.patch next to my
patch on reflection groups. Is anyone working on this patch?
Otherwise, I would try to probably try to put in before mi
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:30:04AM -0400, Christian Stump wrote:
> Is it okay, if I move categories-root_system-6588.patch next to my
> patch on reflection groups. Is anyone working on this patch?
> Otherwise, I would try to probably try to put in before mine, so I can
> work as well on those chang
> I bet it is, I gonna fix it...
fixed...
Is it okay, if I move categories-root_system-6588.patch next to my
patch on reflection groups. Is anyone working on this patch?
Otherwise, I would try to probably try to put in before mine, so I can
work as well on those changes...
Thanks , Christian
--
> Some patches do not seem to apply. Christian, is this due to your recent
> patch?
I bet it is, I gonna fix it...
Best, Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@
Hi!
Some patches do not seem to apply. Christian, is this due to your recent patch?
Anne
...
applying partition_constructor_speedup-fh.patch
applying kshape-om.patch
patching file doc/en/reference/combinat/index.rst
Hunk #1 succeeded at 37 with fuzz 1 (offset 0 lines).
applying categories-root_
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:07:46AM -0700, Bruce wrote:
>My comment about the documentation refers to:
>
>monoids.py line 39
>
>with product rule given by $a \times b = a$ for all $a, b$::
Ah, good: I independently stumbled on that one yesterday, and already fixed it
:-)
>A
My comment about the documentation refers to:
monoids.py line 39
with product rule given by $a \times b = a$ for all $a, b$::
free_monoid.py line 54
OUTPUT: free abelian monoid
A further comment is that I am struggling to avoid deprecated classes.
If I type CombinatorialClass? I am tol
13 matches
Mail list logo
