On 12/9/11 8:08 PM, Mike Zabrocki wrote:
> I reported the following bug on the trac server this evening:
>
> #12140: skew Schur function indexed by [[], []] causes Segmentation
> Fault
>
> I created a patch and attached it to the trac. Should I also put this
> into the sage-combinat queue?
It m
Sorry, it seems that I don't need the line q = s.base_ring().gen() in
the example before.
But I do in the following example:
sage: q = var('q')
sage: s = SFASchur(FractionField(QQ[q]))
sage: q = s.base_ring().gen()
sage: q*s([1])
If I cut out the 3rd line I get an error. What is going on here?
I reported the following bug on the trac server this evening:
#12140: skew Schur function indexed by [[], []] causes Segmentation
Fault
I created a patch and attached it to the trac. Should I also put this
into the sage-combinat queue?
-Mike
--
You received this message because you are subscr
Hi,
I don't know how to fix this problem at the moment. But the question
is, can you verify that the following is a bug?
The following "works" (although I find it weird that I have to have
the third line in this code):
sage: q = var('q')
sage: s = SFASchur(FractionField(QQ[q]))
sage: q = s.base
I had one email exchange with Travis, but the issue is still not resolved. I
will look at the web site.
- Bruce
From: sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com
[sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com] on behalf of Anne Schilling
[a...@math.ucdavis.edu]
Sent:
On 12/9/11 1:55 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> Dear Bruce,
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 06:21:44PM -0800, Bruce Sagan wrote:
>> I had the same problem as William, but I am even further back. I
>> don't understand how to get sage -sh to work. I am running sage in
>> notebook form via Virtual
Dear Bruce,
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 06:21:44PM -0800, Bruce Sagan wrote:
> I had the same problem as William, but I am even further back. I
> don't understand how to get sage -sh to work. I am running sage in
> notebook form via VirtualBox on a Windows 7 machine. Typing the
> command in
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:19:22AM +0100, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> I am asking for:
>
> sage: e = SymmetricFunctions(QQ).e()
> sage: R. = PolynomialRing(QQ)
> sage: e[3,1,1].express_as_polynomial([1,e1,e2,e3])
> e1^2*e3
Ah, you want the result expressed as a plain polynomial. Then it's
just a one-