Re: [sage-combinat-devel] class functions and group actions

2012-01-23 Thread David Joyner
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm looking at what I would like to do in Cernay, and I found new > things about groups and group actions... but perhaps some of the stuff > is implemented somewhere. I will complete the wiki on that

[sage-combinat-devel] class functions and group actions

2012-01-23 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Hello, I'm looking at what I would like to do in Cernay, and I found new things about groups and group actions... but perhaps some of the stuff is implemented somewhere. I will complete the wiki on that topic just before the begining of the week. If you have any comment, please do. 1) The sage.gr

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Free groups, feedback wanted.

2012-01-23 Thread Dima Pasechnik
sorry, I actually looked here: http://www.math.rwth-aachen.de/~CHEVIE/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-combinat-devel/-/k4-DM0trIC4J. To post

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Free groups, feedback wanted.

2012-01-23 Thread Jean MICHEL
Hello, On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 03:58:38AM -0800, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Given that Chevie needs Maple, it can be regarded as "highly optional". I think that you are confused about Chevie. There was a 'Maple part of Chevie' written in 1995 which needs maple to compute Green functions of red

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Free groups, feedback wanted.

2012-01-23 Thread Nicolas Borie
Le lundi 23 janvier 2012 à 03:58 -0800, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > Given that Chevie needs Maple, it can be regarded as "highly > optional". Hello Dima, If you are a Chevie lover, you can already have it in Sage in a fully open-source way. As Jean pointed out, Chevie is also a GAP'3' <-- package

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: lost in simple symmetric function question

2012-01-23 Thread Mike Zabrocki
I sure I don't know what field to work over but I tried a few things: sage: R = FractionField(PolynomialRing(QQ,3,'x')) sage: M = MacdonaldPolynomialsH(R) sage: M.base_ring() Fraction Field of Multivariate Polynomial Ring in q, t over Fraction Field of Multivariate Polynomial Ring in x0, x1, x2 ove

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Free groups, feedback wanted.

2012-01-23 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Given that Chevie needs Maple, it can be regarded as "highly optional". -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-combinat-devel/-/19Vwvg8J9CoJ. To post