Hi Nicolas --
trac_9469-category-membership_without_arguments-nt.patch now gives a
non trivial reject in categories/category.py.
Best, Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-c
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 09:09:42AM +0100, Christian Stump wrote:
> trac_9469-category-membership_without_arguments-nt.patch now gives a
> non trivial reject in categories/category.py.
Sage version?
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil"
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
-
> Sage version?
4.8
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.co
On 2/10/12 5:35 AM, Christian Stump wrote:
>> Sage version?
>
> 4.8
It does not work for me either with sage 4.8
applying trac_12476-lattice_join_matrix_speedup-fh.patch
applying trac_8-finite_enumset_list_cache-fh.patch
applying trac_9469-category-membership_without_arguments-nt.patch
patch
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:07:46AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Could you please fix this, so people with patches later in the queue can work
> on them?
Getting there. The queue should apply on 4.8 and 5.0, at least up to
bigmess-nt.patch excluded. Sorry for the trouble.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 06:04:49PM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> Getting there. The queue should apply on 4.8 and 5.0, at least up to
> bigmess-nt.patch excluded.
It should all apply now ...
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil"
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
On 2/10/12 10:56 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 06:04:49PM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>> Getting there. The queue should apply on 4.8 and 5.0, at least up to
>> bigmess-nt.patch excluded.
>
> It should all apply now ...
I still get a rejection in sage-4.8:
applying t
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:22:15AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> I still get a rejection in sage-4.8:
> applying trac_10963-more_functorial_constructions-nt-4.7.2.patch
> patching file sage/categories/category.py
Shoot. Fixed in principle.
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thi
On 2/10/12 12:51 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:22:15AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
>> I still get a rejection in sage-4.8:
>> applying trac_10963-more_functorial_constructions-nt-4.7.2.patch
>> patching file sage/categories/category.py
>
> Shoot. Fixed in principle.
N
Hello,
Together with the language-team, we decided to implement a
LazyEnumeratedSet (see my patch in the queue) which takes as input an
iterable (finite or infinite) and mimic a set which contains the
element of the iterable. It is very useful when we do not want to
implement a specific class... W
Hi!
I have recently used the poset code quite a lot and would also like to add some
methods,
but do have some questions:
* Is it currently possible to construct a poset from a linear extension
(basically by relabeling
the nodes of the parent poset)? It might be nice to accept a linear extensi
Anne Schilling writes:
> * I have an implementation of tau_i and various generalizations of promotion
> operators on
> a poset. The easiest and fastest to implement these, is to do so on linear
> extensions and
> then pull them back to posets. Where should these methods go since there is
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
