[sage-combinat-devel] integer matrices

2012-06-07 Thread Franco Saliola
Is there something in sage that will return integer matrices with row sums (4, 4, 0, 5) and column sums (3, 7, 1, 0, 2) ? (for example) I have something that does this in the NCSF code on the queue, but I'm wondering whether it is already implemented. -- -- You received this message because you

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: testing new symmetric function functionality

2012-06-07 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi Mike, I did some timing tests on the old and new code: sage: Sym = SymmetricFunctions(QQ['q','t'].fraction_field()) sage: s = Sym.schur() sage: m = Sym.monomial() sage: timeit('m(s([6,3,3,2,1]))') 25 loops, best of 3: 8.51 ms per loop sage: timeit('m(s([10,6,3,3,2,1]))') 5 loops, best of 3: 21

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] testing new symmetric function functionality

2012-06-07 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi Mike, Very impressive work! I am glad you took over my initial patch. I will send you more comments off-line except for the main issues that need to be discussed with everyone. Franco: >> Moreover, LLT polynomials, Hall-Littlewood, Jack and Macdonald symmetric >> functions have all been moved

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] testing new symmetric function functionality

2012-06-07 Thread Franco Saliola
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Mike Zabrocki wrote: > Hey SFA users... > > I've been working on a patch to change how symmetric functions are used in > the future.  I will be deprecating some common functions soon on the sage > combinat queue and we will try to get this into sage in an upcoming

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: testing new symmetric function functionality

2012-06-07 Thread Mike Zabrocki
Hi, I should add that one thing that should really be tested in addition to behavior is *speed*! With these changes there might be potential slow-down from previous versions. We don't want this to happen. I've tested a bit, but this is one thing that is even more difficult to identify than a b

[sage-combinat-devel] testing new symmetric function functionality

2012-06-07 Thread Mike Zabrocki
Hey SFA users... I've been working on a patch to change how symmetric functions are used in the future. I will be deprecating some common functions soon on the sage combinat queue and we will try to get this into sage in an upcoming version. Starting soon: SFAxxx where xxx in {Schur, Monomial

[sage-combinat-devel] help wanted with braid groups

2012-06-07 Thread mmarco
I have been working on an implementation of braid groups for sage (together with free and finitely presented groups). So far i have a preliminary version (see ticket #12339). It is still not feature complete and also very slow compared to cbraid[1], for example, but it is usable. In order to speed