On 7/24/12 6:06 PM, Daniel Bump wrote:
>
> The symmetric function patch #5457 is a big step towards being
> able to work with the Hopf algebra of symmetric functions.
I am glad you appreciate the new functionalities!
> Here's an interesting fact. Recall that the elements of the
> symmetric funct
Hey Andrew,
Here's my 2 cents.
> 1. When I am doing lot of calculations I often generate a large amount of
> output and, consequently, I like this output to be as concise and readable
> as possible. Most of the _repr_ and _str_ methods
> > do not achieve this.
> >
> > What do people think
The symmetric function patch #5457 is a big step towards being
able to work with the Hopf algebra of symmetric functions.
Here's an interesting fact. Recall that the elements of the
symmetric function Hopf algebra can be interpreted as
representations of the symmetric group. For example, the
Schu
Hi All!
I guarded Mark's patch for sage-5.2.rc0 since he will only be able to rebase
it next week.
The queue should now apply also for sage-5.2.rc0, but a lot of patches had
to be guarded. Please check the queue to see whether your patch is marked
#+5_2_rc0 needs rebase on 5_2_rc0!!!
and pleas
I just marked it as "needs work". it needs a (trivial, hopefully) rebase
for Sage 5.2.rc0.
Dima
On Tuesday, 24 July 2012 10:19:56 UTC+8, Andrew Mathas wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> What is the status of your patch #9265? It is not marked as needing review
> and I'd actually assumed it was already m
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:40:44PM +0200, Martin Rubey wrote:
> Well, in the code for determinants, you find
>
> if algorithm is None:
> try:
> R_is_field_attempt = R.is_field()
> except NotImplementedError:
> R_is_field_attempt = Fa
Anne,
I have been able to get this to apply to 5.2.rc0 clean.
I haven't tried it with the combinat queue.
I assume the errors you are posting from when this is applied to
the combinat queue? I'm just trying to install it now.
-Mike
On Friday, 20 July 2012 01:57:47 UTC-4, Anne Schilling wrote:
>
