[sage-combinat-devel] Chromatic Symmetric Function ... Function

2012-07-25 Thread Keeler Russell
Hello everyone, I've been working on a function to calculate the chromatic symmetric function (a.k.a. CSF) of a graph as part of a related research project. You can find the code here: https://github.com/keeler/csf (the files are csf.py and csf.pyx, in particular). I wanted to know if this func

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Some questions generic and less generic questions about sage-combinat

2012-07-25 Thread Andrew Mathas
HI Anne and Travis, Thanks for your replies. With my display() suggestions I was talking about a general mechanism rather than just for the example I gave of partitions. Either passing a flag to _repr_, as Anne suggested, or having a global way of setting output formats as Travis suggested wo

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Hopf algebra methods

2012-07-25 Thread Franco Saliola
Hello, On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Anne Schilling wrote: > On 7/24/12 6:06 PM, Daniel Bump wrote: >> >> The symmetric function patch #5457 is a big step towards being >> able to work with the Hopf algebra of symmetric functions. > > I am glad you appreciate the new functionalities! > >> Her

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: rebasing your patches

2012-07-25 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi Frederic, In this case you should move your patch in the series file to the section ## # Patches merged in 5.2 and keep the guard #+5_2_rc0 since it was merged in this version! Thanks, Anne On 7/25/12 11:30 AM, Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > Hello Anne, > > my patc

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: rebasing your patches

2012-07-25 Thread Frédéric Chapoton
Hello Anne, my patch trac_13088_paley_graphs-fc.patch #+5_2_rc0 needs rebase on 5_2_rc0!!! has been merged in 5.2rc0. see : http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13088 Should I simple delete it from the queue ? Frederic Le mercredi 25 juillet 2012 00:57:19 UTC+2,

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Trac 9265: Remove `CombinatorialClass` from sage.combinat.tableau

2012-07-25 Thread Andrew Mathas
On Tuesday, 24 July 2012 21:53:37 UTC+10, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > I just marked it as "needs work". it needs a (trivial, hopefully) rebase > for Sage 5.2.rc0. > > Thanks, I'll rebase it, if necessary, and review. Andrew -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog