This is something we should certainly have earlier or later (or maybe
someone has code already?):
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/105685/explicit-method-to-compute-macdonald-koornwinder-functions
Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Did you make a quick benchmark on Partitions().random_element(), with
and without caching? Given that number_of_partitions (which was
already fast) was even further optimized recently, maybe caching is
not relevant anymore?
Hi Nicolas,
I have just noticed that Trac #13199
Hi,
trac_13403-bijection_KR_crystals_tableaux-ts.patch doesn't apply on
5.2 . Since it is the newest version, we might want the queue to apply
there (even if most people updated to 5.3.??? already - I am now doing
so with 5.3.rc0).
Christian
--
You received this message because you are
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 08:32:11PM -0700, Andrew Mathas wrote:
Then I think the functionality of RestrictedPartitions should be fully
implemented in Partitions
by allowing several keyword entries.
I had a look at the code and there doesn't seem to be an obvious quick
Hi Christian,
I haven't done it (at least not recently), but the way it is done in type A
in sage is similar to the way it should probably be
done in other types, namely by following the formulas in this
paper by van Diejen-Lapointe-Morse:
http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/math/0303263.pdf
The posting
In addition to Macdonald polynomials there are the nonsymmetric Macdonald
polynomials
which for Type A are implemented in ns_macdonald.py by HHL
(Haglund-Haiman-Loehr)
combinatorial algorithm. But one wants nonsymmetric Macdonald polynomials
for
all Cartan types.
It was discussed at Sage Days
Non symmetric mac donald polynomials are also implemented in
sage-combinat in a more general patch on multivariate polynomials.
This is done by Lascoux's formula using divided differences, but as I
am not a specialist I have not tested this part much.
You can see how the whole patch work on my
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Anne Schilling a...@math.ucdavis.edu wrote:
On 8/29/12 12:16 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:01:13PM -0700, Mike Zabrocki wrote:
Hi,
This one looks really serious. In some ways seems to be computer
dependent because my answers
Non symmetric mac donald polynomials are also implemented in
sage-combinat
in a more general patch on multivariate polynomials.
Thanks ... I guess that is the patch
trac_6629_abstract_ring_of_multivariate_polynomials_with_several_bases_vp.patch
Dan
--
You received this message because
Hi Christian,
Did you try
sage -hg qselect
and then
sage -hg qpush -a
I had changed the guards on trac_11305-rigged_configurations-ts.patch
and the patch trac_13403-bijection_KR_crystals_tableaux-ts.patch is based
on it.
That's what happened for me the first time I applied the queue after
10 matches
Mail list logo
