Hi Dan!
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 04:15:03PM -0700, Daniel Bump wrote:
> Not in principle, but anyway I think the immediate request
> can be satisfied in the context of #13461 (see my previous
> in this thread).
Great; then there is no urgency!
> Sure, but it is a single key algorithm that
> Dan: in the code for the WeylCharacterRing, do you foresee any piece
> of code that would not work generically for any realization of the
> weight lattice?
Not in principle, but anyway I think the immediate request
can be satisfied in the context of #13461 (see my previous
in this thread).
> B
Hi Jesus, Dan,
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 06:51:16AM -0700, JesusTorrado wrote:
>Particle physicists love coroot style (we call it 'Dynkin labels'), so the
>possibility of using it for indicating representations in a
>WeylCharacterRing is great!
>
>For consistency, what about
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 04:01:11AM -0700, JesusTorrado wrote:
>I will put my hands on it, then.
Great, thanks!
>This will be my first contribution to Sage,
Even better: we love when new contributors come in, and this is a
perfect fit for a first contribution.
>so I would ask some pa
