Hi,
I wasn't able to get the queue running on 5.6.beta2 here - but I hope
I didn't introduce too many new problems trying...
@Travis: did you introduce #+5_6_beta1, 10193_rebase ? This way, one
cannot install the combinat queue anymore since sage -combinat
qselect doesn't understand this
Hi!
I think it would be difficult to get the queue to run on 5.6.beta2 without
rebasing Nicolas's trac_10193 patch, since it is then used by his
functorial patches, and quite a lot of other patches depend on them.
My suggestion would be not to worry about it until Nicolas has had a chance
On 1/6/13 8:43 AM, Christian Stump wrote:
Hi,
I wasn't able to get the queue running on 5.6.beta2 here - but I hope
I didn't introduce too many new problems trying...
@Travis: did you introduce #+5_6_beta1, 10193_rebase ? This way, one
cannot install the combinat queue anymore since sage
Hi Anne--
I have disabled the 13742 patches. 5.5 should work fine now with the queue
applied.
cheers,
Hugh
On Friday, January 4, 2013 12:06:45 PM UTC-4, Hugh Thomas wrote:
Hi everyone!
Below are the results of my attempt to apply the queue on 5.6.beta2.
Nicolas:
Hi!
There is a conflict between the pretty_console_print-EliX-jbp patch and the
trac_12719 patches (upgrading IPython). I disabled the trac_12719 patches
for now, since they are at the very bottom of the queue.
cheers,
Hugh
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Hi Hugh,
Thanks, but it does not work for me (even after removing the commas that
appeared before the #+disabled).
applying trac_13728-some_standard_methods_for_fields-cs.patch
applying trac_12587-simplicial_complex_hash-ts.patch
applying trac_12587-simplicial_complex_hash_review-cs.patch
Hi!
It's my fault, you could disable my patch (pretty_console_print-EliX-jbp
patch) if you need...
It's a simple AsciiArt (like in MuPad) which I use before a nice qt console
(I hope).
Happy new year!
Cheers,
Jean-Baptiste
Le dimanche 6 janvier 2013 20:31:32 UTC+1, Hugh Thomas a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 01:57:43PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
Thanks, but it does not work for me (even after removing the commas that
appeared before the #+disabled).
Do you still have issues? It works for me for 5.5.
For 5.6 beta I can work on rebasing the patches on Tuesday.
Cheers,
Hi Anne--
Sorry about the commas.
It looks to me like your guards might be set wrong. I would try running
sage -combinat qselect and then try reapplying the queue.
Or, of you prefer, you can look at/edit your .hg/guards file directly. It
seems to me that disabled must have gotten in
Correction to my previous, the current guards are stored in
.hg/patches/guards, not .hg/guards, according to the Mercurial book.
cheers,
Hugh
On Sunday, January 6, 2013 6:54:01 PM UTC-4, Hugh Thomas wrote:
Hi Anne--
Sorry about the commas.
It looks to me like your guards might be set
On 1/6/13 2:35 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 01:57:43PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
Thanks, but it does not work for me (even after removing the commas that
appeared before the #+disabled).
Do you still have issues? It works for me for 5.5.
For 5.6 beta I can work
11 matches
Mail list logo