On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:32:22AM -0700, Martin wrote:
>Implementing the idea of a GroupAction category would be also of great
>help for the species framework! I could then finally properly
>implement the remaining constructions, where (if I remember correctly)
>I need to specify
Y !!!
> no, DFS uses a stack, i.e. LIFO (Last In First Out), not a queue (FIFO,
First
> in First Out), isn't it?
Indeed. Both would work in this case, though :-P
> and a queue. A bit of discipline never hurts :)
> Otherwise, that's all is needed. But indeed, it's not totally obvi
Implementing the idea of a GroupAction category would be also of great
help for the species framework! I could then finally properly
implement the remaining constructions, where (if I remember correctly)
I need to specify actions of a Young subgroup on a set. In particular
this concerns unlab
On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 7:01:40 AM UTC+1, tom d wrote:
> Specify the action! [...] The 'usual' actions then become special
> predefined objects, like the special graphs, maybe summoned up
> automatically using the permutation/whatever's __call__ function if it's an
> idiomatic action like \
Helloo !!!
> Well, unfortunately I don't know under which Seine bridge mathematicians
> are most
> welcome :-)
Ahahahah. I felt so shocked when I first learnt that Paris did not have the
only one O_O
> Mind you, when this part of GAP was developed, you were in primary
> schoo
On 2013-03-24, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> --bcaec5430f1420c95c04d8a8e8c9
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Helloo Dima !!!
Hi Nathann,
>
> Yesterday I went to walk around the Calanques near the University of
> Marseille, and it did me good ! I am now wanderin
> As a category, I would imagine we would have a GroupAction category and/or
> a GroupWithAction category, which would put some requirements on the group
> and its elements.
I hate categories T_T
Categories is where everything I cherish gets ruined T_T
Nathann
--
You received this message beca
