On 2013-04-29, Nicolas M. Thiery <nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr> wrote: > I would tend to keep them separate; a quiver and its sets of paths are > different mathematical objects. It would be weird to ask for: > > sage: path in quiver > > whereas this is natural: > > sage: path in quiver.paths()
By the way, in Jim's code, the syntax "path in quiver" is used. That's just another reason to turn quivers into a parent structure. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
