Hi all,
I hope I summarise the discussion correctly:
- There is no mathematical difference between a quiver and a digraph.
Hence, there will be no separate sub-class Quiver of DiGraph.
- How shall we call the algebraic structure formed by the paths in a
quiver? PathMonoid? PathMagma?
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 10:42:31AM +, Simon King wrote:
- There is no mathematical difference between a quiver and a digraph.
Hence, there will be no separate sub-class Quiver of DiGraph.
(but we could imagine in the long run having such a subclass, in case
we would want to enforce
Hey,
Fixed.
Best,
Travis
On Wednesday, May 1, 2013 8:48:16 PM UTC-4, Anne Schilling wrote:
Hi Travis,
I think you broke the queue with sage-5.9.rc1. Could you please fix it
immediately since we are working
on patches. Perhaps you could put your patches further down in the queue
to
Hi Sage-Developers,
There is a big series of small books about R that Springer publishes:
http://www.springer.com/series/6991?detailsPage=titles
The editorial director of that series at Springer just talked with me
on the phone for a while, and he says these are among Springers best
selling
Hi William,
This sounds indeed like an interesting idea!
As far as I know, the combinatorics tutorial that you mention has already
appeared in a French Sage book, see http://sagebook.gforge.inria.fr/ .
But I am sure Nicolas can comment on this. Perhaps the entire French book
could be translated
Dear William, dear all,
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 01:27:30PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
There is a big series of small books about R that Springer publishes:
http://www.springer.com/series/6991?detailsPage=titles
The editorial director of that series at Springer just talked with
