Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Further affine matters

2014-02-20 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 09:56:47AM -0800, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: >In http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15384 (which is still somewhat >sketchwork code), I implemented a method symmetric_form() for the root >space. This should (hopefully) work for the roots, but I am doubtful that >it

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Further affine matters

2014-02-20 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
Hey Dan and Nicolas, On Thursday, February 20, 2014 4:43:37 AM UTC-8, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > > Hi Dan! > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:34:53PM -0800, bump wrote: > >Is the invariant inner product implemented already in the ambient > space? > >I think what is called inner pro

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: list papers citing sage!

2014-02-20 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 07:02:21PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote: > Thank you all for sending your references in! We got quite a few new > ones, so please check out the link > > http://www.sagemath.org/library-publications-combinat.html Thanks Anne for collecting them! > Right now, one of the main

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Further affine matters

2014-02-20 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Hi Dan! On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:34:53PM -0800, bump wrote: >Is the invariant inner product implemented already in the ambient space? >I think what is called inner product is actually the dual pairing >between the space and its dual. This is defined in ambient_space.py. The