On Thursday, 16 February 2017 15:41:37 UTC+11, Andrew wrote:
>
> Thanks Travis! Obviously I didn't read the documentation well enough as I
> thought `Facade` was `False` by default -- so I'd tried setting
> `Facade=True` with no joy.
>
> Cheers,
> Andrew
>
>
Unfortunately, now it seems that I
Thanks Travis! Obviously I didn't read the documentation well enough as I
thought `Facade` was `False` by default -- so I'd tried setting
`Facade=True` with no joy.
Cheers,
Andrew
pd. I will have a look at your ticket.
On Thursday, 16 February 2017 13:52:22 UTC+11, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
>
Hey Andrew,
Well, I've recently been looking at DisjointUnionEnumeratedSets (see
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22382) and came across this problem. The
first issue is that DisjointUnionEnumeratedSets does not behave like an
actual facade parent like it claims to be (at least with default v
I am working with disjoint enumerated sets like the following
sage: tabs = DisjointUnionEnumeratedSets(Family(Partitions(3), lambda mu:
cartesian_product([mu.standard_tableaux(),mu.standard_tableaux()])))
sage: tabs[:]
[([[1, 2, 3]], [[1, 2, 3]]),
([[1, 3], [2]], [[1, 3], [2]]),
([[1, 3], [2]],
