On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> right, sorry, I mean a sagews notebook running Sage.
> I did not try other SMC Sage interfaces.
Yes, there is probably somewhere this "show" function involved, which
has the same name but a different implementation -- please don't ask
me abo
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> By the way, this example does work on SMC, so they must be doing something
> non-standard here.
> What is that?
Hi, you need to be more precise, since CoCalc has a rather large
feature surface. In case you mean "sagews" files, they have noth
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> oops, it does work after I install dot2tex by doing
>
> sage -i dot2tex
Well, I can only confirm, that dot2tex is installed on CoCalc...
Better error messages and sanity checks FTW :-)
-- harald
--
You received this message because you
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Matthew Rennekamp
wrote:
> What are we going to do for the files and other publications?
publications will be on the main sagemath.org page, it's just that
there are two links in the menu missing.
-- h
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
> I'll report back when this is working.
Ok, modulo some global dns changes and updates, things like this work:
combinat.sagemath.org/Installation -> wiki.sagemath.org/combinat/Installation
-- harald
--
You received this mess
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 2:02 AM, Anne Schilling wrote:
>> https://github.com/sagemath/publications
> Is just pushed a couple of updates to the references to the repository.
> I hope you can see them.
Unfortunately no ... but ok, I see what's going on. What's missing is
that you go to your own cl
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> All we
> need is to have http://combinat.sagemath.org redirect to
> https://wiki.sagemath.org/combinat/ for "backward compatibility" with
> references in e.g. published papers.
Uhm ok, I'll try to create a redirect like this
http://co
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 5:47 AM, Anne Schilling wrote:
>> http://www.sagemath.org/library-publications-combinat.html
>>
>> ?
>
> Yes, thank you! I see that some references are outdated and some new
> can be added. I will add those soon.
Well, a while ago nathan cohen submitted a few patches to ge
On Thursday, March 23, 2017 at 5:48:20 PM UTC+1, Matthew Rennekamp wrote:
>
> Could we set up another repo, use it as a "project site" (as they call
> it), and then use the www.sagemath.org/combinat as URL forwarding or
> something else?
>
>>
>>
Yes, sure, see [1]. I think we can also have comb
On Thursday, March 23, 2017 at 10:42:18 AM UTC+1, Anne Schilling wrote:
> For example, we had
> a list of all publications citing sage-combinat etc. there. This should
be kept!
Do you mean these publications:
http://www.sagemath.org/library-publications-combinat.html
?
--
You received this
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> As I said before, there are many things in there for
> which *nobody* knows what exactly they are about. Undocumented
> scripts, things which are never called by anything else, different
> workflows on top of each other.
Well, that's a little
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> Why do you need to rearrange/manage those pages at all? Just leave
> them as they are. I don't see the cost of this.
Me neither. The current situation isn't ideal, but just removing one
page and merging everything else doesn't help. Enla
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> It's important to keep track of publications using Sage in order to
> have some sort idea of the usefulness of all the work we put into
> it. I further believe it's important to refine this further, to have
> some idea of the usefuln
Nathan proposes to remove some older publication links from the SageMath
website. I remember the initial decisions about moving from mupad to Sage
from a Sage Day many years ago (Nancy?). My standpoint is, that for the
sake of history it makes sense to keep those publications there … there
migh
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Anne Schilling wrote:
> It would be best to ask Harald Schilly for the git repository and make
> changes directly there.
Hi, yes, that's true. The repository for all publications is here:
https://github.com/sagemath/publications
Appending entries
On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 12:34:58 PM UTC+2, Paul-Olivier Dehaye wrote:
>
> This might be of interest to the sage communities
> https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/node/72901/subscribe
>
>
What I would really like them to do is to even more strengthen their bias
towards "openess". They ad
On Thursday, May 29, 2014 1:09:51 AM UTC+2, William wrote:
> * Wolfram Inc. ...
>
Mathematica available for free on Raspberry Pi
http://www.wolfram.com/raspberry-pi/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To unsubscribe f
Hi, I'm not directly involved and William is probably not the best person
to ask. Just two links (it's late)
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/z4jPFf_vlRY/discussion
http://wiki.sagemath.org/WorkflowSEP
Harald
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Dear William
On Sunday, November 11, 2012 10:00:42 AM UTC+1, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote:
>
> - Having more Sage mirrors in Africa (although the network issues were
> more in the last kilometer).
>
Hi, thank's for this detailed report and the discussion. I'm somewhat
responsible for the mirror network, and
On May 3, 12:33 pm, Florent Hivert
wrote:
> not very pretty ...
> sage: list(itertools.takewhile(lambda i:i>0, (i for i in [1,1,0,0,1,1,0,0])))
the last part is redundant:
list(itertools.takewhile(lambda i:i>0, [1,1,0,0,1,1,0,0]))
H
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
Hi, this is from the "report a problem" bugtracker. I hope I'm posting
no duplicates. If this below is indeed the correct behaviour, it might
be a problem with a confusing documentation.
-- expected behaviour
according to the documentation a string 'abcd' should produce exactly
Hi, I got this from the "report a problem" bugtracker and i don't know
if you know the problem and i hope it's fine to post it here:
Let us define the following morphism over 3 letters:
{{{
substitution=WordMorphism('a->b,b->ac,c->a')
}}}
Then we get
{{{
substitution.is_primitive()
False
}}}
but a
22 matches
Mail list logo
