On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
>
> I just went through the patch. I expect some trivial syntactical
> conflicts with the category patches that Simon is finalizing, and
> there are something like 5 missing doctests, but other than that it
> looks good to go. I'll finalize
Hi Jason!
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:54:18AM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 03:43:30PM -0700, Jason Bandlow wrote:
> > Can you comment on the status of
> >
> > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7980 ?
> >
> > It turns out I used realizations for Qsym, s
Hi Jason!
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 03:43:30PM -0700, Jason Bandlow wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Can you comment on the status of
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7980 ?
>
> It turns out I used realizations for Qsym, so I can either make #7980 a
> dependency (if it will likely go
Hi Nicolas,
Can you comment on the status of
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7980 ?
It turns out I used realizations for Qsym, so I can either make #7980 a
dependency (if it will likely go in soon) or refactor to use the
existing category framework.
Thanks!
Jason
--
You received th
