> Dan: given the amount of change, let me know if it's best to keep the
> reviewer's patch separated, or to fold the two of them before you
> review my changes.
The reviewer patch is big enough that I need to study the changes,
so let's keep them separated for now.
About the tests, I several tim
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 03:11:13PM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 02:39:33PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> > When specifying both parameters q1=q2=0, should one obtain the
> > nilCoxeter algebra, so s1^2=0? However, the code seems to give:
> >
> > sage: R = IwahoriHecke
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 02:39:33PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> When specifying both parameters q1=q2=0, should one obtain the
> nilCoxeter algebra, so s1^2=0? However, the code seems to give:
>
> sage: R = IwahoriHeckeAlgebraT("A3",0,0,prefix = "s")
> sage: [s1,s2,s3] = R.algebra_generators()
>
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 02:39:33PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Also, I get some test failures for 7729 (they all seem trivial since the order
> of the summands is just interchanged), but nonetheless:
Same thing here. I just imported the patch in the Sage-Combinat queue,
and added a patch that
Dear Dan,
Thank you for your patches!
> I have revised both the Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomial and Iwahori
> Hecke algebra patches and reposted them on the trac server.
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7729
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7751
>
> Things that should be in
Dear Andrew, Anne, Brant, Dan,
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 10:12:45PM -0800, Daniel Bump wrote:
> I have revised both the Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomial and Iwahori
> Hecke algebra patches and reposted them on the trac server.
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7729
> http://trac.sage
I have revised both the Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomial and Iwahori
Hecke algebra patches and reposted them on the trac server.
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7729
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7751
Things that should be in coxeter.py have been moved there,
cached methods are