[marc.van-leeu...@math.univ-poitiers.fr: Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: [Cython] LiE in Cython]

2009-10-21 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Please find below a first answer from Marc van Leeuwen who is travelling abroad and can't yet post to the mailing lists. - Forwarded message from Marc van Leeuwen - Quoting Daniel Bump : > William Stein has stated that LiE would not be made a > standard package because it is no longe

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: [Cython] LiE in Cython

2009-10-21 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Dear Dan, Marc, David, Steve, Mike, ... On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 09:53:01AM -0700, Daniel Bump wrote: > > By the way: what's the status of this spkg? Is there some > > documentation somewhere of what can be done with it from Sage? (I just > > tried lie-2.2.2.p3 but it does not seem compile

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: [Cython] LiE in Cython

2009-10-20 Thread Mike Hansen
Hello, On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Daniel Bump wrote: > One important thing LiE can so is to compute > Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials. However it is slow and > can't get much past around B3. Coxeter3 is a better > program for this. KL polynomials are quite important > and it should be a prior

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: [Cython] LiE in Cython

2009-10-20 Thread Daniel Bump
> By the way: what's the status of this spkg? Is there some > documentation somewhere of what can be done with it from Sage? (I just > tried lie-2.2.2.p3 but it does not seem compile on my 32bits i686 > ubuntu box). William Stein has stated that LiE would not be made a standard package because i

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: [sage-devel] Re: [Cython] LiE in Cython

2009-10-17 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Dear David, dear Marc, dear LiE fans, On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 12:44:12AM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Oct 16, 2009, at 6:59 PM, David Simmons-Duffin wrote: > > > A few months ago, I wrote the Cython list asking for some help writing > > a cython interface to the computer algebra pa