[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Categories review: the last ones?

2009-10-29 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 02:33:04AM -0700, javier wrote: > > > > On Oct 29, 12:38 am, "Nicolas M. Thiery" > wrote: > > Again, that's just how it used to be. Do we have an agreement for > > having both: > > > >         PartiallyOrderedSets() > >         TotallyOrderedSets() > > > > I haven't Wik

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Categories review: the last ones?

2009-10-29 Thread javier
On Oct 29, 12:38 am, "Nicolas M. Thiery" wrote: > Again, that's just how it used to be. Do we have an agreement for > having both: > >         PartiallyOrderedSets() >         TotallyOrderedSets() > > I haven't Wikipedia under hand. But since an OrderedMonoid is a > partially ordered set there,

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Categories review: the last ones?

2009-10-28 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Dear Javier, dear all, On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 09:44:33AM -0700, javier wrote: > I have been reviewing the last categories I had assigned. Here some > comments Yippee! > ordered_sets.py > Partially ordered or totally ordered? Why not to call it the > appropriate way then? Again,