Hi Anne,
On 18 Apr., 17:50, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Thanks for your answer. By degree you mean the degree of the relations or
> the degree of the expressions in the quotient monoid/ring?
Everything in Letterplace is subject to a degree bound. That bound is
static in Singular: You need to fix it
Hi Simon,
On 18 Apr., 04:49, Anne Schilling wrote:
Hi Simon,
Using your letterplace code, I get the following error:
Singular error: no more memory
System 65340600k:65340600k Appl 1084175k/64215466k Malloc 18133k/0k Valloc
65281508k/64215466k Pages 16320377/0 Regions 127623:127623
halt 14
PS:
On 18 Apr., 12:04, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> Out of curiosity: does Singular have any builtin memory limit, or is
> it just using as much memory as is available on the system, as the
> above seems to suggest?
We are using libSingular in this example, not a Singular subprocess
via pexpect.
Hi Nicolas,
On 18 Apr., 12:04, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> Out of curiosity: does Singular have any builtin memory limit, or is
> it just using as much memory as is available on the system, as the
> above seems to suggest?
Sorry, I have no idea if you need ulimit to prevent Singular from
eating
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:47:05AM -0700, Simon King wrote:
> On 18 Apr., 04:49, Anne Schilling wrote:
> > Using your letterplace code, I get the following error:
> >
> > Singular error: no more memory
> > System 65340600k:65340600k Appl 1084175k/64215466k Malloc 18133k/0k Valloc
> > 65281508k/64
Hi Anne,
On 18 Apr., 04:49, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Using your letterplace code, I get the following error:
>
> Singular error: no more memory
> System 65340600k:65340600k Appl 1084175k/64215466k Malloc 18133k/0k Valloc
> 65281508k/64215466k Pages 16320377/0 Regions 127623:127623
>
Hi Simon,
Using your letterplace code, I get the following error:
Singular error: no more memory
System 65340600k:65340600k Appl 1084175k/64215466k Malloc 18133k/0k Valloc
65281508k/64215466k Pages 16320377/0 Regions 127623:127623
halt 14
Smaller computations are working fine.
Any idea of ho
On 4/4/11 11:39 AM, Simon King wrote:
Hi Anne,
On 4 Apr., 06:42, Anne Schilling wrote:
Ok. Will you open it? Or do you want me to do so?
I'd prefer if you do.
Ok, this is now #11127.
Cheers,
Anne
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combin
Hi Anne,
On 4 Apr., 06:42, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Ok. Will you open it? Or do you want me to do so?
>
I'd prefer if you do.
Cheers,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combi
Hi Simon,
On 2 Apr., 08:50, Anne Schilling wrote:
...
I think this makes sense; when the elements in the quotient are printed,
there is also a choice which representative is printed. So going through
the iterator, one would just expect to give one of the representatives.
The result of the iter
Hi Anne,
On 2 Apr., 08:50, Anne Schilling wrote:
> ...
> I think this makes sense; when the elements in the quotient are printed,
> there is also a choice which representative is printed. So going through
> the iterator, one would just expect to give one of the representatives.
> The result of th
Hi Simon,
On 1 Apr., 00:09, Anne Schilling wrote:
I have a question regarding the quotients. If I work in the free algebra
sage: F = FreeAlgebra(QQ,3,'x',implementation='letterplace')
sage: x = F.gens()
sage: p=x[1]*x[0]+x[2]*x[2]
I can iterate over the elements:
sage: [w for w in p]
[((0,
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 12:07:36AM -0700, Simon King wrote:
> On 31 Mrz., 21:35, Simon King wrote:
> > Once again, I forgot to include __init__.py in a patch. I will update
> > it on trac tomorrow.
>
> Done. I don't know why, but aparently mercurial will not include an
> empty file in the patch.
Hi Anne,
On 31 Mrz., 21:35, Simon King wrote:
> Once again, I forgot to include __init__.py in a patch. I will update
> it on trac tomorrow.
Done. I don't know why, but aparently mercurial will not include an
empty file in the patch. So, I filled __init__.py with a comment.
You can play with t
Hi Anne,
On 1 Apr., 00:09, Anne Schilling wrote:
> I have a question regarding the quotients. If I work in the free algebra
>
> sage: F = FreeAlgebra(QQ,3,'x',implementation='letterplace')
> sage: x = F.gens()
> sage: p=x[1]*x[0]+x[2]*x[2]
>
> I can iterate over the elements:
>
> sage: [w for w i
Hi Simon,
Thank you for your answers! I keep working with the combined patch
trac7797-full_letterplace_wrapper.patch
for now.
I have a question regarding the quotients. If I work in the free algebra
sage: F = FreeAlgebra(QQ,3,'x',implementation='letterplace')
sage: x = F.gens()
sage: p=x[1]*x
Here is the solution:
Create an empty file __init__.py in .../sage/algebras/letterplace/,
for examply with
touch sage/algebras/letterplace/__init__.py (when you are in
SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/)
Then, sage -br should do the trick.
Once again, I forgot to include __init__.py in a patch. I will u
Hi Anne
On 31 Mrz., 14:09, Anne Schilling wrote:
> /Applications/sage-4.6.2/devel/sage-combinat/sage/algebras/letterplace/free_algebra_letterplace.pxd:15:72:
> Name 'FreeAlgebraElement_letterplace' not declared in module
> 'sage.algebras.letterplace.free_algebra_element_letterplace'
I can repr
On 31 Mrz., 14:09, Anne Schilling wrote:
> /Applications/sage-4.6.2/devel/sage-combinat/sage/algebras/letterplace/free_algebra_letterplace.pxd:15:72:
> Name 'FreeAlgebraElement_letterplace' not declared in module
> 'sage.algebras.letterplace.free_algebra_element_letterplace'
On the other hand, i
Hi Anne,
On 31 Mrz., 14:09, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Applying your two patches
>
> trac11068_nc_ideals_and_quotients.patch
> trac7797-full_letterplace_wrapper_rel11068.patch
>
> in this order, I get the attached error for sage -b. Am I missing a patch?
Do you also have the patch fro
Hi Nicolas,
On 29 Mrz., 11:19, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> All good, as long as it plays smoothly with the patches posted on
> #9944!
Hm. I guess that it is better to post on #9944 rather than on #9138,
then.
Cheers,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 02:05:11AM -0700, Simon King wrote:
> On 29 Mrz., 11:00, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
> wrote:
> > I am happy with the recycling of this ticket. Especially since we also
> > have #9944: categories for polynomial rings.
>
> I guess that could be fixed as well. Currently I have
> s
Hi Nicolas,
On 29 Mrz., 11:00, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> I am happy with the recycling of this ticket. Especially since we also
> have #9944: categories for polynomial rings.
I guess that could be fixed as well. Currently I have
sage: QQ['x'].category()
Category of algebras over Rational
23 matches
Mail list logo
