Dear Andrew, Nicolas, Florent, others,
On 08/18/2010 12:36 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> Jason started working on this ticket. Jason: could you state the
> current status?
The current status is that basically nothing of value has been done
other than thinking a bit about design. Help is very mu
Dear Nicolas and Jason,
I am happy to be the reviewer. Is there any documentation written
about how all of this is about to work? I have looked a little for it
without success. My impression is that the general structure is very
well thought out but without having Nicolas or Florent sitting next t
Dear Andrew and Nicolas,
Nicolas--thanks for you comments! I'm glad to hear that the basic design
I had in mind isn't totally crazy. :)
Andrew, thanks for agreeing to review! I will try to work on this in
the next few weeks. Please add yourself to the cc of trac ticket #9265,
and I'll post what
Thanks for the pointer Jason. I'll have a look.
Andrew
On Sep 3, 12:23 am, Jason Bandlow wrote:
> Dear Andrew and Nicolas,
>
> Nicolas--thanks for you comments! I'm glad to hear that the basic design
> I had in mind isn't totally crazy. :)
>
> Andrew, thanks for agreeing to review! I will try t
Hi Jason,
What's the current status of your tableaux patch? I seem to remember
that there may be some refactoring issues with 4.6.2 so I thought I
should ask first before diving in. I'm currently reinstalling from
source to try and get my missing patch queues back...
If it hasn't been reviewed ye
Hi Andrew, hi tableau fans,
On 05/17/2011 10:58 PM, Andrew Mathas wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> What's the current status of your tableaux patch? I seem to remember
> that there may be some refactoring issues with 4.6.2 so I thought I
> should ask first before diving in. I'm currently reinstalling from
> > 2. Secondly, what do people think about adding a __call__ method to
> > the Tableaux() class:
>
> I guess you mean Tableau() class?
Yes, that's what I meant. For the calling syntax my examples were
wrong. What I would like is
sage: Tableau([[1,2,3,4],[3,4,2,5]])((0,0))
1
sage: Tableau([[1,2,
Hi Nicolas,
> We definitely want a feature of this sort. In MuPAD, we had something
> like T.getxy(i,j) which was doing just that. I think it was discussed
> to allow for T[i,j] or T.get_cell(x,y); T(i,j) could make sense too.
> And we also want T.set_cell(x,y,value) allowing for changing the valu
On May 21, 3:07 am, Jason Bandlow wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A patch is up at #9265. I unfortunately can't mark it as 'needs review'
> officially, because it depends on #10603 which in turn depends on
> #10193, which is not yet posted to trac. But reviews of the current
> state are welcome!
Hi Jason,
Hi Jason!
For once, I am trying hard to procrastinate on the Sage-Combinat
e-mails in order to focus on finishing our paper with Florent and
Anne, instead of the converse; hence my slow answer.
Thanks for your long post! It sounds all fine to me. I'll just insert
a couple micro comments b
Dear tableaux users,
I have (finally!) posted a patch on the queue for trac #9265. This
converts the file tableau.py to use the modern Parent/Element model with
categories. Some highlights:
* Tableau_class no longer exists. If you want to test if something is a
Tableau, you should u
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 07:58:34PM -0700, Andrew Mathas wrote:
> 1. Currently the shape of a tableau must be a partition, however, to
> me it seems more natural to allow the shapes to be arbitrary
> compositions -- and certainly I need this sometimes"). I am not sure
> if this
Hi all,
A patch is up at #9265. I unfortunately can't mark it as 'needs review'
officially, because it depends on #10603 which in turn depends on
#10193, which is not yet posted to trac. But reviews of the current
state are welcome!
(Nicolas, is there anything I can do to help with 10193?)
For t
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Jason Bandlow wrote:
> For the calling syntax, if T is a tableau, both T((0,0)) and T(0,0) will
> work in the current version.
Is there a reason that __call__ is used instead of __getitem__? By
default, T[(0,0)] and T[0,0] are the same thing.
--Mike
--
You re
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 01:07:49PM -0400, Jason Bandlow wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A patch is up at #9265. I unfortunately can't mark it as 'needs review'
> officially, because it depends on #10603 which in turn depends on
> #10193, which is not yet posted to trac. But reviews of the current
> state are
Hi Andrew,
On 05/23/2011 10:45 AM, Andrew Mathas wrote:
> Sorry, this may well be a newbie/RTFM question but is the tableaux
> patch on the patch server?
This is a very good question--the answer was no. But thanks to your
reminder it should be now. Let me know if you have any more problems.
Che
16 matches
Mail list logo
