Hi,
I begin with git so I'm not sure about what I did... but that code should
work to use FQSym:
{{{
fqs = FQSym(QQ)
}}}
or
{{{
from sage.combinat.hopf_algebras.fqsym import FreeQuasiSymmetricFunctions
fqs = FreeQuasiSymmetricFunctions(QQ)
}}}
Then you could use bases like before...
{{{
sage:
We were trying to find FQSym in sage-git. We tried checking out the branch
u/elixyre/ticket/13793 but did not find the code we are looking for. We were
hoping to find code for FreeQuasiSymmetricFunctions similar to this:
https://bitbucket.org/nborie/cha
Did we check out the wrong branch?
On Thur
I put my patch at the top of the queue and it's ok. (It was just a hunk).
Cheers,
Jean-Baptiste
Le samedi 29 décembre 2012 11:28:33 UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
>
> Well, this is not exactly true, as the latex method is not modified in my
> patch. I only introduce new methods (written ju
Well, this is not exactly true, as the latex method is not modified in my
patch. I only introduce new methods (written just before the latex method
indeed)
Is there any conflict with my patch when you apply the queue in full ? does
it say that it need to be rebased ? or is there just a hunk ?
I disabled #13855 because I have re-implement the latex method of
abstract_tree.py and this one is also redefine in q_tree_factorial-fc.patch.
(the attached file contains some examples of latex output)
Le jeudi 20 décembre 2012 18:40:10 UTC+1, Jean-Baptiste Priez a écrit :
>
> I try to implement
