[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Improvements to FreeAlgebra

2017-03-31 Thread Simon King
Hi Travis, On 2017-03-31, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > I agree that this is something that should be fixed (actually 0 is not > recognized as being in a CFM, which is a bug IMO). AFTER the fix from #22707? > Well, we do have a number of CFM subclasses that explicitly have a total > ordering of t

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Improvements to FreeAlgebra

2017-03-31 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
Hey Simon, > > On 2017-03-29, Nicolas M. Thiery > > wrote: > > It would be interesting to know specifically on which aspects the path > > algebra is improving on the current free algebra. The data structure > > of indices (i.e. words in the generators)? The data structure for > > representing

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Improvements to FreeAlgebra

2017-03-30 Thread Simon King
Hi Nicolas, On 2017-03-29, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > It would be interesting to know specifically on which aspects the path > algebra is improving on the current free algebra. The data structure > of indices (i.e. words in the generators)? The data structure for > representing linear combination