Dear Bruce, qsym fans,
Bruce -- thanks very much for agreeing to review! I see you've posted a
ticket at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11929 . I've posted
a patch as a starting point for the review process.
Anyone else interested, please add yourself to the cc on the
ticket!(Further d
> - Read http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/trac.html, and in
> particular request a trac account.
> - Create a ticket on trac for quasi-symmetric functions
> - Add a reference to that ticket in:
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/SageCombinatRoadMap
> (search for qsym/ncsf in t
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:41:15AM -0700, Bruce wrote:
> Fair enough! This may test your patience.
:-)
> What happens now?
- Read http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/trac.html, and in
particular request a trac account.
- Create a ticket on trac for quasi-symmetric functions
- Add a refe
Fair enough! This may test your patience. What happens now?
On Oct 14, 8:34 am, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:20:30AM -0700, Bruce wrote:
> > In principle I am happy to volunteer. My reservation is that I have no
> > experience of tickets, patches, reviewing code etc. an
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:20:30AM -0700, Bruce wrote:
> In principle I am happy to volunteer. My reservation is that I have no
> experience of tickets, patches, reviewing code etc. and would need
> someone to tell me what to do.
This is actually a plus: given your activity, we want to get you
inv
In principle I am happy to volunteer. My reservation is that I have no
experience of tickets, patches, reviewing code etc. and would need
someone to tell me what to do.
On Oct 14, 5:05 am, Jason Bandlow wrote:
> Quasisymmetric functions are available with sage-combinat, but they
> haven't made it
