Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: getattr of elements

2011-05-19 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 03:49:49PM -0700, Simon King wrote: > I agree that it is not an issue. But for the record: It is in sage/ > categories/primer.py and is as follows. > sage: p = 6*x^2 + 12*x + 6 > sage: R. = PolynomialRing(QQ, sparse=True) > sage: pQ = R ( p ) > sage: pQ._pow_

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: getattr of elements

2011-05-17 Thread Simon King
Hi Nicolas, On 17 Mai, 14:49, "Nicolas M. Thiery" wrote: > Eventually, all parents should have their category initialized (thanks > for your work on this direction!). So if your suggested change does > not break the tests (as your other email points out), the principle > sounds very reasonable to

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: getattr of elements

2011-05-17 Thread Simon King
On 16 Mai, 21:27, Simon King wrote: > So, aparently the only question is what we intend to do in the case of > a non-initialised parent. I plan to open a ticket tomorrow morning, > but perhaps you can already state your opinion on that question. The ticket is #11342, and it is ready for review!

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: getattr of elements

2011-05-16 Thread Simon King
On 16 Mai, 19:14, Simon King wrote: > Similarly, if an attribute is requested from an element, then the > attribute may be looked up in the element class of > self.parent().category() --- but it is *not* requested that the > category is initialized. > > Should it be requested? If we can request it