[sage-combinat-devel] Re: sage.combinat.sf.sf into the reference manual?

2012-03-10 Thread Simon King
Hi Florent, On 10 Mrz., 10:07, Florent Hivert wrote: > Standard ReST markup: > > http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html > > Sphinx specific markup: > > http://sphinx.pocoo.org/markup/index.html Thank you! Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to t

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: sage.combinat.sf.sf into the reference manual?

2012-03-10 Thread Florent Hivert
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 04:47:50PM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 06:51:15AM -0800, Simon King wrote: > > Still: Is there a list of available markups? > > Florent? Standard ReST markup: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html Sphinx specific marku

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: sage.combinat.sf.sf into the reference manual?

2012-03-09 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 06:51:15AM -0800, Simon King wrote: > Still: Is there a list of available markups? Florent? > It is #12645. I hope the title "Abstract Algebra of Symmetric > Functions" is appropriate for that module. Done. I slightly edited the title. Thanks! Cheers,

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: sage.combinat.sf.sf into the reference manual?

2012-03-09 Thread Simon King
Hi Nicolas, On 9 Mrz., 15:12, "Nicolas M. Thiery" wrote: > The intention was to use > .. rubric:: instead. That looks much better! Still: Is there a list of available markups? > You are welcome to fix those, and also to add the > missing link (gasp!) to sf/sf.py in the reference manual! It is

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: sage.combinat.sf.sf into the reference manual?

2012-03-09 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Hi Simon! On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 06:07:09AM -0800, Simon King wrote: > On 9 Mrz., 14:49, Simon King wrote: > > What should happen with the ".. topic:" thingy: > > The correct syntax seems to be: > > .. topic:: Title > > A not too long box of > text that explains the > topi

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: sage.combinat.sf.sf into the reference manual?

2012-03-09 Thread Simon King
Sorry for partially answering myself: On 9 Mrz., 14:49, Simon King wrote: > What should happen with the ".. topic:" thingy: The correct syntax seems to be: .. topic:: Title A not too long box of text that explains the topic indicated in the title. If it is used in that way, th

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: sage.combinat.sf.sf into the reference manual?

2012-03-09 Thread Simon King
And while I am at it: In sage/structure/dynamic_class.py and sage/combinat/sf/sf.py, it is attempted to use a Sphynx directive: ..topic: Why dynamic classes? However, that line appears in the doc exactly in that form (i.e., "..topic:" is printed). In fact there seems to be a misspelling in th