On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 08:10:52AM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Thank you for figuring out what the problem was!! However, did you
> push your fix? With all patches applied, I still get the error
> and on the patch server I cannot see that you pushed any changes
> recently.
That was my fourth b
Hi Nicolas,
Thank you for figuring out what the problem was!! However, did you
push your fix? With all patches applied, I still get the error
and on the patch server I cannot see that you pushed any changes
recently.
Cheers,
Anne
>> I just downloaded the 4.1.1 binary and ran ./sage -combinat i
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:57:57AM -0700, Brant Jones wrote:
> I just downloaded the 4.1.1 binary and ran ./sage -combinat install,
> so I should be working with a fresh version of everything.
> Nevertheless, I still get that the 2 node is connected to the 5 node
> in E7 when I run:
>
> C = Carta
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 08:09:15AM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
>> sage: DynkinDiagram(["E",7]).edges()
>>
>> [(1, 3, 1), (2, 4, 1), (3, 1, 1), (3, 4, 1), (4, 2, 1), (4, 3, 1),
>> (4, 5, 1), (5, 4, 1), (5, 6, 1), (6, 5, 1), (6, 7, 1), (7, 6, 1)]
>> sage: DynkinDiagram(
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 08:09:15AM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> sage: DynkinDiagram(["E",7]).edges()
>
> [(1, 3, 1), (2, 4, 1), (3, 1, 1), (3, 4, 1), (4, 2, 1), (4, 3, 1),
> (4, 5, 1), (5, 4, 1), (5, 6, 1), (6, 5, 1), (6, 7, 1), (7, 6, 1)]
> sage: DynkinDiagram(["E",7,1]).edges()
>
> [(0, 1,
>> Perhaps I am going crazy, but I get:
>>
>> --
>> | Sage Version 4.1, Release Date: 2009-07-09 |
>> | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.|
>> --
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 07:52:09AM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
>
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Perhaps I am going crazy, but I get:
>
> --
> | Sage Version 4.1, Release Date: 2009-07-09 |
> | Type notebook() for th
Hi Nicolas,
Perhaps I am going crazy, but I get:
--
| Sage Version 4.1, Release Date: 2009-07-09 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.|
--
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 04:26:54PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> The labeling of the Dynkin nodes for type E_7 in sage does not
> seem consistent with the labeling of the affine nodes:
> Should we fix this? It would make much more sense to attach node 2
> in E_7 to node 4 instead of node 5.
Err
