On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 02:04:44PM +0100, Christian Stump wrote:
Christian: I had to slightly rebase
trac_11187-finite_reflection_groups-cs.patch for the doctests I just
added to apply_simple_reflection and friends.
This time I rebased nonnesting_partitions-cs.patch which was touching
Hi Anne,
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 04:09:13PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
Impressive patch! Thanks for working on this.
:-)
Thanks so much for your very useful and quick review. I really
appreciate that!
Followup on http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6588
Cheers,
Christian: I had to slightly rebase
trac_11187-finite_reflection_groups-cs.patch for the doctests I just
added to apply_simple_reflection and friends.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry Isil nthi...@users.sf.net
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this
Hi --
as you are currently discussing root systems (including 6588, thanks a
lot for working on that!): here are some issues that made it very hard
for me to work with root systems for finite reflection groups:
# the first and the second seem to behave very differently:
sage: x =
Hi Christian,
as you are currently discussing root systems (including 6588, thanks a
lot for working on that!): here are some issues that made it very hard
for me to work with root systems for finite reflection groups:
# the first and the second seem to behave very differently:
sage: x =
Hi Nicolas,
Impressive patch! Thanks for working on this.
Here are some first comments:
- In /sage/categories/affine_weyl_groups.py there is a new import
from sage.categories.infinite_enumerated_sets import InfiniteEnumeratedSets
which is not used. Please either remove this line or add
