Hi Travis,
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 02:38:18PM -0700, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
> I think the first one is due to me import the latest version of the iet
>move patch #8386; thus should be a simple rebase (and I don't think anyone
>has touched that in a while). The second one is
Hey Jean-Baptiste,
I think the first one is due to me import the latest version of the iet
move patch #8386; thus should be a simple rebase (and I don't think anyone
has touched that in a while). The second one is likely due to our work
(Arthur and me) on #14772 and/or #14101 and is likely tr
Hi,
I guess that the doc problem is because of #14669 (I will have a
look). For the other one I have no clue.
Vincent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
First:
applying dynamics-iet-tutorial.patch
unable to find 'doc/en/reference/combinat/iet.rst' for patching
1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
doc/en/reference/combinat/iet.rst.rej
patch failed, unable to continue (try -v)
patch failed, rejects left in working dir
errors during app
