Hi David and Martin,
I just figured out what the deals is with FiniteField_givaro crashing for
us.
I am making fields globally unique (so, e.g., arithmetic is faster and so
SAGE is
very uniform), so I made Martin's FiniteField_givaro class weak
referenceable,
since that way we can make the
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:21:09 -0800, David Harvey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 30, 2006, at 7:44 PM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>> On Monday 30 October 2006 22:38, David Harvey wrote:
>>> I want to start applying our arithmetic architecture to _mul_. The
>>> fast
>>> pathway for __mul__ needs
On Oct 30, 2006, at 7:44 PM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
> On Monday 30 October 2006 22:38, David Harvey wrote:
>> I want to start applying our arithmetic architecture to _mul_. The
>> fast
>> pathway for __mul__ needs to be able to quickly identify the case of
>> multiplying an element of a base r
On Monday 30 October 2006 22:38, David Harvey wrote:
> I want to start applying our arithmetic architecture to _mul_. The fast
> pathway for __mul__ needs to be able to quickly identify the case of
> multiplying an element of a base ring of an algebra by an element of
> the algebra (or commutative
William Stein wrote:
> I think I read the long reply you made just now, so I don't think it
> really got dropped.
Yes, the google machine thinks I am a spammer. This is because I once
reported a spammer involved in click fraud. The evidence I sent to
google contained a virus, so google blacklis
I want to start applying our arithmetic architecture to _mul_. The fast
pathway for __mul__ needs to be able to quickly identify the case of
multiplying an element of a base ring of an algebra by an element of
the algebra (or commutative algebra as the case may be). The sanest way
to do this r
A derived work is a derived work. If it isn't licensed for making
derivatives, my personal belief is that we shouldn't be having this
conversation.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this grou
William Stein wrote:
> It's just like writing a research paper -- you have an acknowledgements
> section.
Yes. I guess my concern was to ensure that whatever was written, was
legally covered by the GPL. I'd hate it to fall through a crack on
account of me having not made attribution by the legal
I assume you want to do 2 things:
1. translate their PDE solver (numerical or symbolic?),
2. translate the DG computation package.
For 2, I'd contact the guy who presented the work at the conference and
tell him what you'd like to do. Better yet, you could ask him for help.
For 1, I imagine this w
On 10/30/06, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 03:26:06 -0800, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I assume you want to do 2 things:
> > 1. translate their PDE solver (numerical or symbolic?),
> > 2. translate the DG computation package.
> > For 2, I'
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:00:02 -0800, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Google groups seems to have just lost a substantial reply I made. This
> has happened more than once and seems to be related to the "reply
> without quote" option.
>
> I don't want to type all that again, but here are th
On Oct 30, 2006, at 4:21 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 03:26:06 -0800, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I assume you want to do 2 things:
>> 1. translate their PDE solver (numerical or symbolic?),
>> 2. translate the DG computation package.
>> For 2, I'd conta
> Another difficulty I have is, how does one give attribution when the
> code you write is heavily based on code by someone else (where their
> code *IS* GPL'd), but your code has been rewritten to the point where
> you can't just put their copyright notice on the code?
>
> There is an example of
I've always viewed "clean room" design with a bit of romanticism. So I'd love
to help.
Three key points of the wikipedia article:
1) However, because independent invention is not a defense against patents,
clean room designs typically cannot be used to circumvent patent restrictions.
2) This
Google groups seems to have just lost a substantial reply I made. This
has happened more than once and seems to be related to the "reply
without quote" option.
I don't want to type all that again, but here are the salient points:
1) MAPLE are pretty careful about their code. MAPLE authors also t
I had a similar problem with the quadratic sieve I was developing.
Someone developed an extremely nice trick for speeding up the quadratic
sieve, implemented it in MAPLE (I'm not sure if it is actually part of
the core functionality of MAPLE, since it seems to factor extremely
slowly), then wrote
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 03:26:06 -0800, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I assume you want to do 2 things:
> 1. translate their PDE solver (numerical or symbolic?),
> 2. translate the DG computation package.
> For 2, I'd contact the guy who presented the work at the conference and
> tell
17 matches
Mail list logo
