On 7/7/07, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm happy with the
Attribution-ShareAlike Creative Commons license:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/
I think there is also a GPL Documentation license which is
similar.
+
On
2007/7/8, Hamptonio [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My biases are probably based on using mathematica for 17 years, but I
like the way it handles numerical vs symbolic computations. So at
present, in sage, sin(1) is symbolic, and sin(1.0) is numerical, and
+1, I like this behavior as well. And I like
Hello all:
Recently there as been a divisive discussion on the Axiom
deveopers list which has led to an Axiom fork. Two lead developers,
Martin Rubey and Waldek Hebisch quit. Both are extraordinarily talented
programmers and Martin is the author of GUESS, a unique and
important package which I
On 7/8/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey William, can you set up a mercurial server to serve up the branch that
you'll most likely release?
Yes, that's maybe a good idea, though this directory has *everything* needed
to upgrade to sage-2.7.alpha, along with a README.txt that
On 7/8/07, Ralf Hemmecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some ideas:
1. Assuimg Axiom becomes part of SAGE, all Axiom patches are
to be voted on democratically among the Axiom deveopers.
(Majority rules.)
Any comments on any of this?
Do you work in sage like that majority rules? I know that
2007/7/7, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So I propose that the only symbolic variables that are predefined
are x (since it's so useful to have this predefined), I (=sqrt(-1)),
and e (=2.7...).
I myself prefer to import everything by hand in Python. Thus the sage
module can have many
Hi,
Thanks for all the feedback from everybody about symbolic variables,
special functions, etc. For now (i.e., the very near term), I think
the best thing to do is:
(1) remove all predefined *symbolic* variables except x,
leave in e, pi, and I:
-- everybody basically wants
