On 9/16/07, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some comments on the recent GAP comments relevant to SAGE:
(0) The talk on SAGE went quite well and generated interest.
Excellent.
(1) Many GAP developers and some GAP packages authors like
SAGE and plan on looking into the extra
Speaking of parallel processing in Python, I recently heard about the
pp module:
http://www.parallelpython.com/ It may be something that we want to look at.
--Mike
On 9/16/07, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some comments on the
2007/9/16, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Solaris 10 on Opteron:
toolchain:
../gcc-4.2.1/configure --with-ld=/usr/sfw/i386-sun-solaris2.10/bin/ld
--with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas \
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.2.1 --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --with-
gmp=/usr/local/gmp-4.2.2-32/ \
On Sep 16, 8:17 pm, didier deshommes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/9/16, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Solaris 10 on Opteron:
toolchain:
../gcc-4.2.1/configure --with-ld=/usr/sfw/i386-sun-solaris2.10/bin/ld
--with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas \
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.2.1
2007/9/16, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
it looks like you are running a fairly recent OpenSolaris build. But
is it pure OpenSolaris or Nexenta? I know you used Nexenta in the
past, but that is quite different because the userspace is close to
100% GNU while Solaris is sufficiently different to
On Sep 16, 9:13 pm, didier deshommes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/9/16, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello Didier,
it looks like you are running a fairly recent OpenSolaris build. But
is it pure OpenSolaris or Nexenta? I know you used Nexenta in the
past, but that is quite different
For future reference, about 3-4 days ago I changed things so that the
public notebook server:
(1) Doesn't use ssl at all, and
(2) Is at http://sagenb.org (and another at http://sagenb.com), so
there is no funny business with ports.
Thus the above setup shouldn't get blocked
I just wanted to say awesome and keep up the good work. I'll be
testing Sage on Solaris/x86 soon.
On Sep 16, 3:25 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
On Sep 16, 9:13 pm, didier deshommes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/9/16, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello Didier,
it
On Sep 17, 12:16 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to say awesome and keep up the good work. I'll be
testing Sage on Solaris/x86 soon.
Well, we are getting very close now:
Hangs (due to pecpect issues?):
sage -t rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_element.py
One last thing, I wanted to say that my earlier Mathematica comments
do not (usually) apply when dealing with the individual developers,
who are (usually) very helpful, especially on MathGroup. The thing I
am complaining about is the overall process of reporting and fixing
problems.
On Sep 14,
10 matches
Mail list logo
