On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Ivan Andrus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for clarification, you're only talking about distributiong the
OUTPUT of
a non-GPL'd program? You're not distributing the program itself at
all but
just the output of the program, right?
Correct. I
On Mar 6, 2008, at 1:01 PM, William Stein wrote:
Before we can release Sage-3.0 the doctest coverage must reach 50%.
This is one of the more
difficult goals for Sage-3.0. Thus I propose that we have a Sage Doc
Days this Sunday.
Whose interested in helping?
Sure.
david
Hi all,
after the Scipy/Sage Days 8 meeting, we were all very impressed by the
progress made by Cython. For those not familiar with it, Cython:
http://www.cython.org/
is an evolved version of Pyrex (which is used by numpy and scipy) with
lots of improvements. We'd like to position
Sorry, I am tied up on Sunday (though possibly will no longer be by
the time the sun rises over Seattle. Assuming that it does.)
However I have benn trying to contribute to doctests where competent
and will continue to do so when possible!
John
On 06/03/2008, David Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would love to help!
On Mar 6, 10:17 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I am tied up on Sunday (though possibly will no longer be by
the time the sun rises over Seattle. Assuming that it does.)
However I have benn trying to contribute to doctests where competent
and will
Currently if I try to run valgrind on sage.math, it just says
permission denied. Is that intentional, or did the permissions get
screwed up somehow?
Bill.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
I will try to help, although my weekends get consumed by family
obligations sometimes. I'm not sure what areas are low in coverage
that I am competent to help with.
Almost all of my use of sage involves optional packages - phcpack,
biopython, and polymake. The easiest thing for me would be to
On Mar 6, 8:39 pm, Bill Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bill,
Currently if I try to run valgrind on sage.math, it just says
permission denied. Is that intentional, or did the permissions get
screwed up somehow?
Bill.
Nope, that version has been disabled on purpose since it can't deal
The following code causes a crash:
R = BooleanPolynomialRing(2)
f = 1 + R.gens()[0]
s = f.set()
t = set(s)
# this happened on sagenb.org, as well as the latest SAGE version
installed locally.
Unhandled SIGSEGV: A segmentation fault
Will you be publishing a list of which modules are lacking acceptable
doctest coverage?
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 1:01 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Before we can release Sage-3.0 the doctest coverage must reach 50%.
This is one of the more
difficult goals for Sage-3.0.
I'm in. I'll likely work on either modular/hecke (24.7%) or
modular/modsym (14.2%).
-cc
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:01 AM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Before we can release Sage-3.0 the doctest coverage must reach 50%.
This is one of the more
difficult goals for Sage-3.0.
I'll be there. So far I've been doctest-ing various files in sage/
rings (ring.pyx, ideal.pyx, integer_ring.pyx). I'd like to see where
people want to see more detailed docstrings and doctests.
--
Chris Swierczewski
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group,
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Chris Swierczewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll be there. So far I've been doctest-ing various files in sage/
^^
Hey, you're local. Want to meet at a coffee shop, e.g., one in
Capitol Hill?
Will you be publishing a list of which modules are
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 at 10:01AM -0800, William Stein wrote:
Before we can release Sage-3.0 the doctest coverage must reach 50%.
This is one of the more difficult goals for Sage-3.0. Thus I propose
that we have a Sage Doc Days this Sunday. Whose interested in
helping?
Since I opened a ticket
On Mar 6, 3:06 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, you're local. Want to meet at a coffee shop, e.g., one in
Capitol Hill?
Sure thing! I'd like to get some Sage work done in the morning.
(Algebra study session in the mid-afternoon.) Are there any other
Seattle-ites out there who
I think the best one for me would be interfaces; if other people are
interested in something in there please let me know so I don't
duplicate effort. I am most interested in (and will start with) the
phc, mathematica, and tachyon interfaces.
Will this be coordinated on IRC, or a wiki, or
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:07 PM, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the best one for me would be interfaces; if other people are
interested in something in there please let me know so I don't
duplicate effort. I am most interested in (and will start with) the
phc, mathematica, and
The following might be acceptable.
(1) The user downloads a Fluid app.
(2) The user downloads a separate sage-2.10.2.dmg (say).
(3) When Fluid app runs it asks for the location of the sage dmg,
extracts it
into itself, and uses that.
Then the combination of Fluid with Sage only
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 12:53:43 -0800 (PST)
VictorMiller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following code causes a crash:
R = BooleanPolynomialRing(2)
f = 1 + R.gens()[0]
s = f.set()
t = set(s)
# this happened on sagenb.org, as well as the latest SAGE version
installed locally.
This is a
Does one just add a bunch of documentation and make a patch and submit
it? Or does one make a bunch of Trac tickets and make a ton of
patches?
On Mar 6, 9:55 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:07 PM, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the best one for
On Mar 7, 8:53 am, Timothy Clemans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does one just add a bunch of documentation and make a patch and submit
it? Or does one make a bunch of Trac tickets and make a ton of
patches?
The idea is to add doctests. One would add doctests to one file or
directory of files
Hi,
I was at Sage Days 8 and I posted what we were doing in there to my blog:
http://ondrejcertik.blogspot.com/2008/03/sage-days-8.html
here I'd like to put some points related to SymPy and Sage.calculus.
We discussed quite a lot of it in Austin, but I'd like to have it in
the mailinglist as
22 matches
Mail list logo
