Hi,
in a moment of procrastination I came up with this:
https://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/1728/
Hopefully somebody can put this banality to good use within SAGE :)
Best,
--
Hector
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.c
On Mar 8, 2008, at 23:59 , mabshoff wrote:
>
> Here we go with 2.10.3.rc3. This is still not the final release
> since LinBox still causes trouble. I did valgrind the latest
> linbox 1.1.5rc2 release and Clement Pernet will get a long email
> in the morning :)
>
> Other than that we finally foun
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Philippe Saade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry to bother with such trivial stuff...
>
> Suppose i want to ask a student to find a way to define a vector in
> Sage and compute its norm...
>
> My questions are :
>
> 1/ how is he supposed to find the answer i
I forgot to mention, the vertical axis is the number of queries per
day. I think the spike is from when sage was featured on slashdot.
On Mar 9, 6:09 pm, Chris Chiasson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the full traffic history of the sage cse:
>
> http://chris.chiasson.googlepages.com/2008-03-09SAGES
One other thing that I think is relevant in a situation like this:
software like Mathematica will have a major economic damping factor
applied to its growth, so that after it reaches a large number of
users, it will effectively saturate its market (since others can't pay
for it)
sage will be limi
the full traffic history of the sage cse:
http://chris.chiasson.googlepages.com/2008-03-09SAGESearchEngineStats4074T.png
4074 is the total number of queries in the life of the custom search
engine
On Mar 9, 5:56 pm, Chris Chiasson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like to compare the Sage's Google
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Chris Chiasson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My guess is that the 2 million users estimate is inflated by students
> who do not really learn these systems. When I was in undergraduate
> school, most people barely scratched the surface of Mathematica.
Well I hop
Since they are still in that rc I should mention a couple of typos
that
I spotted in two spkg.
In linbox in the spkg-install file on line 41 we have an interesting
reference to ${SAGE_LCOAL}.
In sage-2.10.3.rc3 in the top setup.py at line 430 we have:
define_macros = [('GSL_DISABLE_DEPRECAED','1')
I like to compare the Sage's Google Groups activity to Mathematica's.
Recently there was a big jump in MMA's, but Sage was kicking butt for
a while there.
On Mar 9, 11:38 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:31 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I
My guess is that the 2 million users estimate is inflated by students
who do not really learn these systems. When I was in undergraduate
school, most people barely scratched the surface of Mathematica.
On Mar 9, 11:38 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:31 AM
a guess:
sage answer = you write documentation to do this and then submit it to
sage
alternative:
if the documentation already exists, you could find it via the search
functionality linked from the main page
On Mar 9, 5:05 pm, "Philippe Saade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry to bother with su
Sorry to bother with such trivial stuff...
Suppose i want to ask a student to find a way to define a vector in
Sage and compute its norm...
My questions are :
1/ how is he supposed to find the answer in the docs ?
2/ how can he easily browse the source to find the "vector" class
definition and
Slightly fancier; my four-year-old daughter talked me into it:
colorlist =
['red','green','blue','brown','black','white','orange','grey','purple']
var('s,t')
g(s) = ((0.57496*(121 - 16.0*s^2)^(.5))/(10.+ s)^(.5))
def P(color, rng):
return parametric_plot3d((cos(t)*g(s), sin(t)*g(s), s),
mabshoff wrote:
> Here we go with 2.10.3.rc3. This is still not the final release
> since LinBox still causes trouble. I did valgrind the latest
> linbox 1.1.5rc2 release and Clement Pernet will get a long email
> in the morning :)
>
> Other than that we finally found a workaround for #1337 and
>
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:31 AM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree; I'm not sure 10^6 users is a useful goal to have, although I
> am not against it.
Again, the goal is not 10^6 users, it is "to be a viable alternative to
Maple, Mathematica, Matlab, and Magma". Any free program th
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Martin Albrecht
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Estimate of number of Sage users by year:
> >
> > Feb 2005: 3
> > Feb 2006: 100
> > Feb 2007: 500
> > Feb 2008: 5,000
> > Feb 2009: 10,000 (Goal)
> > Feb 2009: 25,000 (Goal)
> > Feb 2010: 100,000 (Goal)
>
I agree; I'm not sure 10^6 users is a useful goal to have, although I
am not against it.
One of my hopes/goals for Sage is to make every mathematics researcher
and educator aware of its existence, and for it to be useful to a
large fraction of those folks. Accomplishing that would result in
rou
> Estimate of number of Sage users by year:
>
> Feb 2005: 3
> Feb 2006: 100
> Feb 2007: 500
> Feb 2008: 5,000
> Feb 2009: 10,000 (Goal)
> Feb 2009: 25,000 (Goal)
> Feb 2010: 100,000 (Goal)
> Feb 2011: 1,000,000 (Goal)
Hi,
I wonder what the status of this goals is. Is it something we all shoul
The mathematica one has a nice egg shape, which I think is
surprisingly hard to get right. It uses the implicit surface
x^2/4*(1 + 0.1 z) + y^2/4*(1 + 0.1 z) + z^2/2.75^2 = 1
so I can tweak your code for an improvement in shape:
var('s,t')
g(s) = abs(sin(1-s)+0.01*sin(2*(1-s)))
g(s) = ((0.5749
One of the comments mentioned a link to a great page on elliptic
curves but I think they just meant ellipses. Not that I have a
one-track mind or anything!
John
On 09/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For the record, that wasn't me. I haven't used Mathematica nearl
20 matches
Mail list logo
