Hi,
Regarding fast cyclotomic linear algebra, there is now a wiki page up:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/cyclo
which has a link to some code, todo list, notes, etc., We
have a basic matrix type for cyclotomic
linear algebra, and today Craig and I worked on fast multimodular charpoly.
Our first
For the record: I have reverted the patches after Nick suggested
backing them out. We plan to release 3.0.1 soon, but we can revisit
this in 3.0.2 ;)
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscr
Richard Fateman wrote:
>
Hello,
>
>> The paramount reason to attempt to go with ecl instead of gcl
>> or clisp
>> [only self-hosted, build from source, Open Source lisps need
>> apply :)]
>
> As I've mentioned previously, this seems to me an arbitrary requirement;
Yes, I am well awa
Richard Fateman wrote:
> Hi Michael:
Hi Richard,
> Out of curiosity, I visited the ECL home page.
It is my understand that the sf website is mostly out of date, so I
never took a closer look. The current state can be found in a
presentation at
http://ecls.wiki.sourceforge.net/space/showimag
I have taken a look at the code. Some tweaking will be needed to make
it sensibly compatible with the existing code for point counting of
elliptic curves. There, the function cardinality() takes a parameter
extension_degree with default 1, while you do a base change to get the
cardinality over
On 27-Apr-08, at 10:58 AM, Craig Citro wrote:
>
> I agree -- I was thinking that as soon as Kiran's code was merged,
> someone who knew their way around all the various code we have for
> elliptic and hyperelliptic curve zeta functions (so including David
> Harvey's stuff that was just merged) wo
I agree -- I was thinking that as soon as Kiran's code was merged,
someone who knew their way around all the various code we have for
elliptic and hyperelliptic curve zeta functions (so including David
Harvey's stuff that was just merged) would come along and add in code
that called off to the app
On 27-Apr-08, at 4:59 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> How does this generic code interact with the existing code for
> elliptic curves?
I read the code and I think that Kiran's zeta function needs to be
overridden for elliptic curves to use the existing BSGS and Kedlaya
implementations.
Nick
How does this generic code interact with the existing code for elliptic curves?
John
2008/4/15 Kiran Kedlaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> There is an old ticket #793 about implementing a zeta_function method
> for hyperelliptic curves. Such a method would have to have a default
> behavior in case
For the record, a version of my generic code (with a bit of help from
craigcitro) has been merged into 3.0.1alpha1, as ticket #3031. Anyone
now interested in tackling #793 should let me know.
Kiran
On Apr 15, 1:56 pm, Kiran Kedlaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is an old ticket #793 about i
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> this is 3.0.1.alpha0. So far we have only merged bugfixes,
> nothing invasive so far. 24 tickets have been closed so far
> and I am not quite sure what the rest of the release cycle
> will look like because it currently doesn't look like we
> need a pure bug fix
11 matches
Mail list logo
