I'm just looking at the GMP spkg in sage to see what if any SAGE
patches can be applied to mpir before we make our first release.
Can someone tell me what the various patches do. I know what the
fastgcd, gmp-4.2.1-core2-port and mpn_amd64.42 patches do and they are
self explanatory, but what do t
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:06 PM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2008/6/27 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Could someone who knows orders in number fields verify that they are
>>> not at the mo
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 16:19 -0700, Glenn H Tarbox, PhD wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 14:22 -0700, Clement Pernet wrote:
> > Sorry about this, I could not test it since my install of 3.0.4 is still
> > not finished.
> >
> > However, I fixed it and tested it on a 3.0.3. So I reopened #3429 and
> >
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 14:22 -0700, Clement Pernet wrote:
> Sorry about this, I could not test it since my install of 3.0.4 is still
> not finished.
>
> However, I fixed it and tested it on a 3.0.3. So I reopened #3429 and
> proposed a patch there that will fix it.
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sa
2008/6/27 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Could someone who knows orders in number fields verify that they are
>> not at the moment unique parents and, if that is the desired
>> behaviour, explain why?
>
> I d
Ok, nevermind. I talked with Yi yesterday, and I've got a reasonable way to
slowly migrate that won't be too invasive. It means throwing a bit of work
away, but it's definately worth it.
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> If anybody is doing anything to the notebook, please do
Sorry about this, I could not test it since my install of 3.0.4 is still
not finished.
However, I fixed it and tested it on a 3.0.3. So I reopened #3429 and
proposed a patch there that will fix it.
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/3429/update_new_linbox_interface.patch
Let m
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 12:32 -0700, Clement Pernet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry about this.
>
> This can be fixed by a trivial patch, that I forgot to add to the ticket
> #3429. I am currently testing it before attaching it to the ticket.
>
> If you want to try it:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could someone who knows orders in number fields verify that they are
> not at the moment unique parents and, if that is the desired
> behaviour, explain why?
I do not like the current behavior. I would be very with y
Hello Sage-Devel,
There will be a Sage postdoc position at UW (University of Washington)
for 2 years that will soon be available (e.g., starting in 2009). If you're
going to be on the job market and are potentially very interested in this
position, please write to me off list and let me know.
Hi,
Sorry about this.
This can be fixed by a trivial patch, that I forgot to add to the ticket
#3429. I am currently testing it before attaching it to the ticket.
If you want to try it:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/pernet/Patches/trac-3429-fix.patch
Cheers,
Clément
John Cremona a é
All,
I've opened a new group list for DsageNg at:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-dsageng
At this early stage, there will likely be lots of discussion as we work
through the issues. It was felt that segmenting the email traffic would
be useful.
There will come a time when DsageNg (or whate
Failed for me too.
John
2008/6/27 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sage-3.0.4.alpha1 doesn't build on any of the 13 platforms where
> I tested the build. They fail with problems probably due to refactoring
> some code in linbox.
>
> [when building the sage library]
>
> "sage/libs/
Hi,
Sage-3.0.4.alpha1 doesn't build on any of the 13 platforms where
I tested the build. They fail with problems probably due to refactoring
some code in linbox.
[when building the sage library]
"sage/libs/linbox/linbox.cpp:105:25: error: linbox_wrap.h: No such
file or directory"
so linbox_wr
On Jun 27, 11:50 am, "Joel B. Mohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 27 June 2008 04:59:37 am Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> In general, the difference between
> multivariate and univariate should not matter in practice.
>
+1.
E.g. exponents() on univariate ring returns a list of int, while
exp
On Friday 27 June 2008 04:59:37 am Burcin Erocal wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:40:34 -0700 (PDT)
>
> Bjarke Hammersholt Roune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This is definitely a bug since the docs explicitly say:
> > > "PolynomialRing(base_ring, name, sparse=False) returns a univariate
> > > p
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:40:34 -0700 (PDT)
Bjarke Hammersholt Roune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is definitely a bug since the docs explicitly say:
> > "PolynomialRing(base_ring, name, sparse=False) returns a univariate
> > polynomial ring; all other input formats return a multivariate
>
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 00:10 -0700, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 27, 12:00 am, "Glenn H Tarbox, PhD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 23:49 -0700, Glenn H Tarbox, PhD wrote:
> > > I'm all failure all the time with pbuild on hardy 32 and 64 and gutsy 64
> > > using pbuild.
> >
After upgrading to FF 3.0, my problems disappeared, but I only just
did it, so it needs some further testing...
Stan
On Jun 26, 7:55 pm, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have noticed some weird behavior on FF that might be the same
> problem. I have a very large cell that I don't want to
On Jun 27, 12:00 am, "Glenn H Tarbox, PhD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 23:49 -0700, Glenn H Tarbox, PhD wrote:
> > I'm all failure all the time with pbuild on hardy 32 and 64 and gutsy 64
> > using pbuild.
>
> > a log from a 32 bit hardy failure is at:
>
> >http://tarbox.o
On Jun 26, 2008, at 10:56 PM, Carl Witty wrote:
> Consider the following Sage run, from Sage 3.0.3:
>
> sage: x1 = PolynomialRing(ZZ, 'x').gen()
> sage: x2 = PolynomialRing(ZZ, 'x', sparse=True).gen()
> sage: (x1+x2).parent()
> Univariate Polynomial Ring in x over Integer Ring
> sage: (x2+x1).par
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 23:49 -0700, Glenn H Tarbox, PhD wrote:
> I'm all failure all the time with pbuild on hardy 32 and 64 and gutsy 64
> using pbuild.
>
> a log from a 32 bit hardy failure is at:
>
> http://tarbox.org/sage/hardy32.log.bz2
>
> rebuilding now without pbuild... will let you kno
22 matches
Mail list logo
