[sage-devel] Re: Problems with is_irreducible function

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Peter Schwabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I just encountered a problem with the is_irreducible function. The > following code does not work as exptected: > > p = > 82434016654300679721217353503190038836571781811386228921167322412819029493183 > F = GF(p) >

[sage-devel] Re: Bug(?)/Feature request: list_plot doesn't plot numpy arrays

This needs to be a ticket, but the patch as is has some issue with the way numpy is imported. Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with multi-extension fields

On Oct 14, 7:14 am, Peter Schwabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > the following code doesn't finish computation: > > p = > 82434016654300679721217353503190038836571781811386228921167322412819029493183 > F = GF(p) > Fu. = F[] > Fext2. = GF(p**2, name='X', modulus=u**2 + 2) > xi = X + 1 > xi

[sage-devel] Re: Problems with is_irreducible function

On Oct 14, 7:02 am, Peter Schwabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I just encountered a problem with the is_irreducible function. The > following code does not work as exptected: > > p = > 82434016654300679721217353503190038836571781811386228921167322412819029493183 > F = GF(p) > > Fu. = F[]

[sage-devel] Sage 3.2.rc2 released!

Hello folks, here goes rc2 which fixes the last set of blockers left over from 3.2.rc1. it has been out for eight hours in IRC, but it seems like a good idea to announce it here. Aside from #4557 this should be it for patches merged into 3.2, so please build, test and report as usual. Sources an

[sage-devel] Re: plot(2*cos) makes graph of 2*sin

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 19, 2008, at 2:19 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > >> >> Jason Grout wrote: >>> Scott Walck wrote: The sage command plot(2*cos) produces a plot of 2*sin(x). This seems like a bug. This occurs

[sage-devel] Re: plot(2*cos) makes graph of 2*sin

On Nov 19, 2008, at 2:19 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > > Jason Grout wrote: >> Scott Walck wrote: >>> The sage command >>> >>> plot(2*cos) >>> >>> produces a plot of 2*sin(x). This seems like a bug. This occurs in >>> sage 3.1.4 and on the web version. >>> >>> Note that >>> >>> plot(2*cos(x)) >>> >>

[sage-devel] Re: nth_root for finite fields: 'extend' not implemented?

Patch posted at . John --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at ht

[sage-devel] Re: plot(2*cos) makes graph of 2*sin

Jason Grout wrote: > Scott Walck wrote: >> The sage command >> >> plot(2*cos) >> >> produces a plot of 2*sin(x). This seems like a bug. This occurs in >> sage 3.1.4 and on the web version. >> >> Note that >> >> plot(2*cos(x)) >> >> works properly. Also, >> >> plot(2*sin) >> >> appears to give t

[sage-devel] Re: Mathematica 7 coming

On Nov 19, 12:12 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > William Stein wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Jason Grout > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I just received this in an email from Wolfram: > > >> Dear Mathematica User, > > >> Soon we will release Mathematica 7! As a Pre

[sage-devel] Re: nth_root for finite fields: 'extend' not implemented?

On 19 Nov, 18:26, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 19, 2008, at 10:18 AM, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > > > > The documentation for the nth_root method for finite fields (repeated > > in each of the files sage/structure/element.pyx, sage/rings/ > > finite_field_element.py, an

[sage-devel] LAPACK 3.2

The above was forwarded to the Scipy list, but I guess enough people here care: Original Message Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:03:40 -0800 From: James Demmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Kreinovich, Vladik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, reliable computing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: James Demmel <[EMA

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] Mathematica 7 coming

William Stein wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Jason Grout > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I just received this in an email from Wolfram: >> >> Dear Mathematica User, >> >> Soon we will release Mathematica 7! As a Premier Service > It's out now: http://www.wolfram.com/products/mathema

[sage-devel] Re: nth_root for finite fields: 'extend' not implemented?

On Nov 19, 2008, at 10:18 AM, John H Palmieri wrote: > > The documentation for the nth_root method for finite fields (repeated > in each of the files sage/structure/element.pyx, sage/rings/ > finite_field_element.py, and sage/rings/finite_field_givaro.pyx) says > this: > > INPUT: >

[sage-devel] nth_root for finite fields: 'extend' not implemented?

The documentation for the nth_root method for finite fields (repeated in each of the files sage/structure/element.pyx, sage/rings/ finite_field_element.py, and sage/rings/finite_field_givaro.pyx) says this: INPUT: n -- integer >= 1 (must fit in C int type) extend -

[sage-devel] Re: small bug in _latex_ method: -1^n

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:21 AM, Anders Claesson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There's a problem with powers of negative numbers the latex method for > symbolic arithmetic. > In version 3.1.4 I get this: > > sage: var('n') > n > sage: latex((-1)^n) > {-1}^{n} > > It should, of course, be {(-1)}^{

[sage-devel] Re: R GPL v3?

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:11:14AM -0500, Gabriel Gellner wrote: > > I just noticed that R seems to be using GPL v3 as of at least 2.7.1, > is this an issue for SAGE? > > I get this from within R > > > RShowDoc("COPYING") > GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE >Version 3, 29 June 2007 > The

[sage-devel] small bug in _latex_ method: -1^n

There's a problem with powers of negative numbers the latex method for symbolic arithmetic. In version 3.1.4 I get this: sage: var('n') n sage: latex((-1)^n) {-1}^{n} It should, of course, be {(-1)}^{n}. Anders --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send e