Thanks for posting those David! I don't have a camera with me
unfortunately.
We should bring the 3D glasses every year just for the photo
opportunities.
On Jan 6, 9:17 pm, "David Joyner" wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Sage is getting a really good reception here at the
> AMS conference. I am posting
> toht
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> There was another request on sage-edu for a nice way to edit text cells
> in the notebook. Patches which enable a very nice in-place wysiwyg
Just to emphasize the importance (and not meaning to hijack the
thread): There wa
Hi everyone,
There was another request on sage-edu for a nice way to edit text cells
in the notebook. Patches which enable a very nice in-place wysiwyg
editor for text cells are sitting on trac waiting to be reviewed. Some
people have reviewed them and found them to work well. I'm not sure
Hehe, assuming you use gcc 4.0.4 even Sage 0.9.10 [the oldest release
listed on the source page - there are older releases still :)] is
trivially buildable on sage.math:
mabsh...@geom:/disk/scratch/mabshoff-sage-releases/sage-0.9.10$ ./sage
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi William,
>
> On Jan 7, 4:43 pm, "William Stein" wrote:
>> Also, sage.math has 24 cores, so even 20 processes running fullspeed
>> compute tasks might not slow sage.math down noticeable.
>
> Cool! I thought that it has maybe 8 cores.
>
If
Hi William,
On Jan 7, 4:43 pm, "William Stein" wrote:
> Also, sage.math has 24 cores, so even 20 processes running fullspeed
> compute tasks might not slow sage.math down noticeable.
Cool! I thought that it has maybe 8 cores.
However, network IO was an issue for me.
Cheers,
Simon
--~--~
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 2:10 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 7, 2:02 am, Simon King wrote:
>> Dear Michael
>>
>> On Jan 7, 9:31 am, mabshoff wrote:
>>
>> > The main problem right now is the sluggish build due to rather high
>> > disk IO latency caused by stress tests via 15 VMWare drives buil
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Simon King wrote:
>
> Dear William,
>
> On Jan 7, 4:02 pm, "William Stein" wrote:
>> Delete
>>
>>local/lib/sage-flags.txt
>
> Thank you!
> Anything else to do (sage -b or so)?
Nope, that's it. When you first start sage again it will auto-create
a new sage-fl
Dear William,
On Jan 7, 4:02 pm, "William Stein" wrote:
> Delete
>
>local/lib/sage-flags.txt
Thank you!
Anything else to do (sage -b or so)?
Cheers
Simon
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubsc
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Jan 6, 9:09 am, mabshoff wrote:
>> Please report any issues you see.
>
> I tried to upgrade from sage-3.2, that was built from source.
>
> I got a result, but when I start sage it says:
> ***
Hi Michael,
On Jan 6, 9:09 am, mabshoff wrote:
> Please report any issues you see.
I tried to upgrade from sage-3.2, that was built from source.
I got a result, but when I start sage it says:
**
WARNING! This Sage install was
> Too bad. But it should still be reported and fixed. malb: any opinion
> here?
sage: P.=IntegerModRing(5)[]
sage: f=x*(y^2-x)^2+y^5;
sage: g=y^4+y^3-x^2
sage: f.resultant(g)
---
TypeError Trac
On Jan 7, 2:02 am, Simon King wrote:
> Dear Michael
>
> On Jan 7, 9:31 am, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > The main problem right now is the sluggish build due to rather high
> > disk IO latency caused by stress tests via 15 VMWare drives build in
> > parallel :)
>
> Currently sage.math is busy with abo
Dear Michael
On Jan 7, 9:31 am, mabshoff wrote:
> The main problem right now is the sluggish build due to rather high
> disk IO latency caused by stress tests via 15 VMWare drives build in
> parallel :)
Currently sage.math is busy with about 20 processes that have
something to do with vmware (v
On Jan 7, 1:34 am, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 at 12:31AM -0800, mabshoff wrote:
Hi Dan,
> > Well, it took the better part of the night, but I finally got Sage
> > 1.0.0 to build and start on sage.math. William dared me in IRC to do
> > this last night, but I showed him [being obvi
On Jan 7, 1:34 am, Martin Rubey wrote:
> mabshoff writes:
> > Is this what you want?
Hi,
> Actually, I want:
>
> (15) -> f := x*(y^2-x)^2+y^5; g := y^4+y^3-x^2
>
> 4 3 2
> (15) y + y - x
> Type: Polynomial(Integer)
> (
On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 at 12:31AM -0800, mabshoff wrote:
> Well, it took the better part of the night, but I finally got Sage
> 1.0.0 to build and start on sage.math. William dared me in IRC to do
> this last night, but I showed him [being obviously aware of reverse
> psychology here :)]
>
> mabsh...
mabshoff writes:
> Is this what you want?
Actually, I want:
(15) -> f := x*(y^2-x)^2+y^5; g := y^4+y^3-x^2
432
(15) y + y - x
Type: Polynomial(Integer)
(16) -> factor resultant(f,g,x)
92
(16) y
On Jan 7, 1:08 am, Martin Rubey wrote:
> What did I do wrong? I have no idea how to proceed!
Hi Martin,
> Martin
>
> sage: f=Integers(5)[y][x](x*(y^2-x)^2+y^5); g=Integers(5)[y][x](y^4+y^3-x^2);
> sage: f
> x^3 + 3*y^2*x^2 + y^4*x + y^5
> sage: f.res
> f.reset_name f.resultant
> sage: f.r
What did I do wrong? I have no idea how to proceed!
Martin
sage: f=Integers(5)[y][x](x*(y^2-x)^2+y^5); g=Integers(5)[y][x](y^4+y^3-x^2);
sage: f
x^3 + 3*y^2*x^2 + y^4*x + y^5
sage: f.res
f.reset_name f.resultant
sage: f.resultant(g)
*** Mod(1, 5)*x already exists with incompatible vale
Hello folks,
Well, it took the better part of the night, but I finally got Sage
1.0.0 to build and start on sage.math. William dared me in IRC to do
this last night, but I showed him [being obviously aware of reverse
psychology here :)]
mabsh...@sage:/disk/scratch/mabshoff-sage-releases/sage-1.0
21 matches
Mail list logo
