2009/10/10 William Stein :
> I'm *really* glad you noticed this bug before it is too late!!!
>
> Regarding fixing it, I have no idea a priori, except to figure out
> what changed in the new version of ECL. Does the issue really just
> vanish by switching to the older ECL (can you test this)? If
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Georg S. Weber
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> trying to (finally) give #7112 a positive review (which it surely
> deserves, but I wanted to test this myself thoroughly first), I ran
> into another, new problem. It's now trac ticket #7186, see there for
> full details. In
Hi all,
trying to (finally) give #7112 a positive review (which it surely
deserves, but I wanted to test this myself thoroughly first), I ran
into another, new problem. It's now trac ticket #7186, see there for
full details. In a nutshell, the recent maxima/ecl upgrade seems to
have introduced ha
On Oct 3, 6:49 am, lutusp wrote:
> Hello all. I have completed my Sage tutorial, located at:
>
> http://arachnoid.com/sage
> I am more than open to comments and criticism -- I would like to edit
> and tune these page while they're fresh in my mind.
Really nice work on this tutorial series. The
lutusp wrote:
> This bug is very easy to create -- just specify an FFT instance using
> a power of 2 and try to perform an inverse FFT:
>
> age: a = FFT
> (1024)
> sage: a.inverse_transform()
>
> Unhandled SIGSEGV: A segmentation fault
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:34 AM, lutusp wrote:
>
> This bug is very easy to create -- just specify an FFT instance using
> a power of 2 and try to perform an inverse FFT:
>
> age: a = FFT
> (1024)
> sage: a.inverse_transform()
>
> Unha
This bug is very easy to create -- just specify an FFT instance using
a power of 2 and try to perform an inverse FFT:
age: a = FFT
(1024)
sage: a.inverse_transform()
Unhandled SIGSEGV: A segmentation fault occured in SAGE.
This probably
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 9:36 AM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
> When I came (and returned after few
> months back) to Sage, I was supprised that the algebraic things are
> supported much better than the things from calculus. Is the
> explanation that the more Sage developers do their research (and
> l
On Oct 3, 6:09 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Would you be willing to license the tutorial under a CreativeCommons
> license, so it could be included in Sage in exactly the same style as
> the other Sage docs and so we could create a mirror of the tutorial on
> the sagemath.org website?
Done. The
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:09 AM, MaxTheMouse
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Oct 10, 7:38 pm, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> There is an #optional directive one can pyt on doctests so they get
>> run (and output tested) only if the user has installed the package.
>> Sounds like that's what we should be using he
On Oct 3, 4:33 am, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> My only comment for now is that your tutorial looks very beautiful and
> professional.
Thank you! I remain open to any corrections or improvements you care
to suggest (I'm not a professional mathematician by any stretch).
--~--~-~--~~
On Oct 10, 7:38 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> There is an #optional directive one can pyt on doctests so they get
> run (and output tested) only if the user has installed the package.
> Sounds like that's what we should be using here.
>
> - Robert
>
Unfortunately, these are not run by Sage
Hi,
As announced before, *.sagenb.org will be down for a couple of hours
today for migration to a new server.
William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, sen
There is an #optional directive one can pyt on doctests so they get
run (and output tested) only if the user has installed the package.
Sounds like that's what we should be using here.
- Robert
On Oct 10, 2009, at 6:20 AM, MaxTheMouse wrote:
> I decided to try patching the test but I now re
On Oct 3, 6:09 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Would you be willing to license the tutorial under a CreativeCommons
> license, so it could be included in Sage in exactly the same style as
> the other Sage docs and so we could create a mirror of the tutorial on
> the sagemath.org website?
Sure, I hav
On Oct 3, 4:36 am, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Oct 3, 12:49 pm,lutusp wrote:
>
> > I am more than open to comments and criticism
>
> Hi, great work! I'll link to the page from the sage help page, as an
> "external resource".
> The only point i'm not happy with is the navigation of the page. The
>
Lots of packages in Sage make use of a program called 'install'. If you
build Sage on Solaris, you might well have noticed warnings about
'install' not supporting a specific option.
There are a few issues with 'install'
* On Solaris, the only one is in /usr/sbin, which is where normally
only r
There seem be problems with trac.sagemath.org. It was possible to find
the ticket, but the patch was missing. Now the site seems to be down
again.
O.K. No problem, we have to wait. When I came (and returned after few
months back) to Sage, I was supprised that the algebraic things are
supported mu
I decided to try patching the test but I now realise that test_Wise.py
is not actually the problem. In fact since I don't have the WISE2
software installed that test is skipped. The actual test is in the doc
string of the module.
"""
>>> os.environ["WISE_KBYTE"]="30"
>>> _build_align
19 matches
Mail list logo
