[sage-devel] Re: GPLK quesitons

2010-06-22 Thread Nathann Cohen
Hello Dave !!! I feel I can give bad answers to each of your question, as I may be at fault for each of them :-) 1) 2) If you think these options may be of help, there is no reason why they shouldn't be added. I don't actually remember to have looked at the list of them when I struggled with this

[sage-devel] Windows README files out of date

2010-06-22 Thread Robert Miller
http://www.sagemath.org/mirror/win/ has a couple README files which indicate that to develop in Sage you can ssh into the virtual machine and develop that way. They tell you to use "login" and "sage" as credentials. This is out of date since the current credentials are "sage" and "sage". Can so

[sage-devel] spurious "file not found"

2010-06-22 Thread William Stein
Hi Willem (and Sage-devel), People have been reporting some weird "file not found" errors after doing "make test". This is caused by your #7793, I think. See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9316 for the ticket that we hope you might have a clue how to fix. -- William -- Willi

Re: [sage-devel] GPLK quesitons

2010-06-22 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/23/10 04:36 AM, Robert Miller wrote: sed -i 's/GPLK/GLPK/g' this-thread ;) I don't like that -i option myself! Dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more

Re: [sage-devel] GPLK quesitons

2010-06-22 Thread Robert Miller
sed -i 's/GPLK/GLPK/g' this-thread ;) -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.s

[sage-devel] GPLK quesitons

2010-06-22 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
I'm just looking over the spkg-install of GPLK to * Sort out the SAGE64 issue http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9312 * Update to the latest upstream code * Clean it up a bit. * Add spkg-check There are a few things that seem a bit strange about how this is built in Sage. 1) GPLK is *NOT

Re: [sage-devel] Do we need the BLAS package?

2010-06-22 Thread François Bissey
> > So do you believe BLAS needs to remain in Sage, > > Probably not. > > > or could it be removed in 4.5? > > If somebody removes it. > > > If it is removed, what should numpy and scipy link to - ATLAS, cblas ?? > > I don't know. > numpy needs lapack and because of it the blas library lapac

Re: [sage-devel] Do we need the BLAS package?

2010-06-22 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > On 06/23/10 03:27 AM, William Stein wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Dr. David Kirkby > >>> I suspect it is currently used, but perhaps we can remove it. That will >>> probably mean changing a few packages which currently link

Re: [sage-devel] Do we need the BLAS package?

2010-06-22 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/23/10 03:34 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: It it is removed, what should numpy and scipy link to - ATLAS, cblas ?? *IF* it is removed what should numpy and scipy link to - ATLAS, cblas ?? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group

Re: [sage-devel] Do we need the BLAS package?

2010-06-22 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/23/10 03:27 AM, William Stein wrote: On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Dr. David Kirkby I suspect it is currently used, but perhaps we can remove it. That will probably mean changing a few packages which currently link with BLAS, to force them to link with ATLAS instead. Unfortunately, ma

Re: [sage-devel] Do we need the BLAS package?

2010-06-22 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > On 06/22/10 05:45 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >> On Jun 22, 2010, at 12:43 AM, David Kirkby wrote: >> >>> Someone commented the other day that he could not understand why BLAS >>> was in Sage when we had ATLAS. This was in response to my

Re: [sage-devel] GLPK license and version

2010-06-22 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > On 06/23/10 02:35 AM, William Stein wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Dr. David Kirkby >>  wrote: >>> >>> There seems to be an agreement to include GLPK, but as I noted elsewhere, >>> the package does not build properly on 64-

Re: [sage-devel] GLPK license and version

2010-06-22 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/23/10 02:35 AM, William Stein wrote: On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: There seems to be an agreement to include GLPK, but as I noted elsewhere, the package does not build properly on 64-bit Solaris, as the right compiler flag (-m64) does not get added. Robert crea

Re: [sage-devel] GLPK license and version

2010-06-22 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > There seems to be an agreement to include GLPK, but as I noted elsewhere, > the package does not build properly on 64-bit Solaris, as the right compiler > flag (-m64) does not get added. Robert created a ticket for this. Thanks so much fo

[sage-devel] GLPK license and version

2010-06-22 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
There seems to be an agreement to include GLPK, but as I noted elsewhere, the package does not build properly on 64-bit Solaris, as the right compiler flag (-m64) does not get added. Robert created a ticket for this. http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9312 The spkg-install and SPKG.txt

Re: [sage-devel] Do we need the BLAS package?

2010-06-22 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/22/10 05:45 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Jun 22, 2010, at 12:43 AM, David Kirkby wrote: Someone commented the other day that he could not understand why BLAS was in Sage when we had ATLAS. This was in response to my concern about linbox not being able to find BLAS http://trac.sagemath.o

[sage-devel] photos

2010-06-22 Thread William Stein
Hi, I'm posting my photos from Sage Days 22 as soon as I can to the schedule here: http://wiki.sagemath.org/days22/schedule Speakers at Sage Days 22 -- please post your slides to the above webpage, if you use slides. If you don't want to use the wiki, email me. William -- William Stein Pro

Re: [sage-devel] Re: shell commands in the notebook

2010-06-22 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: >>> 3. If you do not want to use virtual machine, at least do not run sage >>> notebook under you account! > >> If you somewhat trust the 20 or so users, you can set accounts=True, >> make their accounts, then set account=False before publishin

Re: [sage-devel] Do we need the BLAS package?

2010-06-22 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Jun 22, 2010, at 12:43 AM, David Kirkby wrote: Someone commented the other day that he could not understand why BLAS was in Sage when we had ATLAS. This was in response to my concern about linbox not being able to find BLAS http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9101 Robert Bradshaw did

Re: [sage-devel] Re: shell commands in the notebook

2010-06-22 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
>> 3. If you do not want to use virtual machine, at least do not run sage >> notebook under you account! > If you somewhat trust the 20 or so users, you can set accounts=True, > make their accounts, then set account=False before publishing so random > people won't be able to join. If you trust the

[sage-devel] %directive in sage-notebook

2010-06-22 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
Sorry for crossposting, but I guess that topic should get a wider audience. Obviously that notebook has been very much tailored for having Sage as the standard session/system type. However, the notebook also allows to set the standard system type to some other system, for example to "axiom (option

Re: [sage-devel] Re: shell commands in the notebook

2010-06-22 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Jun 22, 2010, at 2:22 AM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote: On 22 čvn, 02:29, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: Thanks. Looks like I rather want to use localhost. But I need it for about 20 users. What options do I have to give to "sage -notebook"? 1. Run sage inside virtual machine. Do not put your private s

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for including GLPK standard in Sage

2010-06-22 Thread Harald Schilly
i'm for cbc but since i've just learned that the cpl is not compatible with the gpl i say > [ x ]  yes, include glpk ;) H -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more op

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Vote for including GLPK standard in Sage

2010-06-22 Thread Robert Miller
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Dr David Kirkby wrote: > The package does not even add the -m64 flag, so will not build on > OpenSolaris x64 or on some Macs - it completley ignores the SAGE64 > variable. > > So whilst the package could be made to work, as it is, I think it > should not be includ

Re: [sage-devel] Do we need the BLAS package?

2010-06-22 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 5:38 AM, David Kirkby wrote: > On 22 June 2010 11:19, François Bissey wrote: >>> On 06/22/10 10:10 AM, François Bissey wrote: >>> >> Someone commented the other day that he could not understand why BLAS >>> >> was in Sage when we had ATLAS. This was in response to my conce

Re: [sage-devel] Fwd: Graphviz spkg

2010-06-22 Thread David Kirkby
On 22 June 2010 08:36, Nathann Cohen wrote: > Hello Everybody ! > > I have been trying to install the Graphviz package recently, though it > ended up with an error precisely when all seemed to have been compiled > successfully :-/ > make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs That is often

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Graphviz spkg

2010-06-22 Thread Rob Beezer
Installation fails on Ubuntu and Solaris, according to: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7438 Looks to me like installation halts at the same point. Rob On Jun 22, 12:36 am, Nathann Cohen wrote: > Hello Everybody ! > > I have been trying to install the Graphviz package recently, thoug

Re: [sage-devel] Do we need the BLAS package?

2010-06-22 Thread David Kirkby
On 22 June 2010 11:19, François Bissey wrote: >> On 06/22/10 10:10 AM, François Bissey wrote: >> >> Someone commented the other day that he could not understand why BLAS >> >> was in Sage when we had ATLAS. This was in response to my concern >> >> about linbox not being able to find BLAS >> > >> >

Re: [sage-devel] Do we need the BLAS package?

2010-06-22 Thread François Bissey
> On 06/22/10 10:10 AM, François Bissey wrote: > >> Someone commented the other day that he could not understand why BLAS > >> was in Sage when we had ATLAS. This was in response to my concern > >> about linbox not being able to find BLAS > > > > That was me. For info sage-on-gentoo only uses ATLA

Re: [sage-devel] Do we need the BLAS package?

2010-06-22 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/22/10 10:10 AM, François Bissey wrote: Someone commented the other day that he could not understand why BLAS was in Sage when we had ATLAS. This was in response to my concern about linbox not being able to find BLAS That was me. For info sage-on-gentoo only uses ATLAS without any issues.

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Graphviz spkg

2010-06-22 Thread Dima Pasechnik
it installs for me OK on debian (stable) running Sage 4.4.1. On Jun 22, 9:36 am, Nathann Cohen wrote: > Hello Everybody ! > > I have been trying to install the Graphviz package recently, though it > ended up with an error precisely when all seemed to have been compiled > successfully :-/ > >

[sage-devel] Re: shell commands in the notebook

2010-06-22 Thread ma...@mendelu.cz
On 22 čvn, 02:29, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: > Thanks. > > Looks like I rather want to use localhost. But I need it for about 20 > users. What options do I have to give to "sage -notebook"? > 1. Run sage inside virtual machine. Do not put your private ssh keys into this machine. Do not install import

Re: [sage-devel] Do we need the BLAS package?

2010-06-22 Thread François Bissey
> Someone commented the other day that he could not understand why BLAS > was in Sage when we had ATLAS. This was in response to my concern > about linbox not being able to find BLAS That was me. For info sage-on-gentoo only uses ATLAS without any issues. I believe the blas spkg only ship libblas.

[sage-devel] Do we need the BLAS package?

2010-06-22 Thread David Kirkby
Someone commented the other day that he could not understand why BLAS was in Sage when we had ATLAS. This was in response to my concern about linbox not being able to find BLAS http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9101 Robert Bradshaw did a list of what he considered the most important parts

[sage-devel] Fwd: Graphviz spkg

2010-06-22 Thread Nathann Cohen
Hello Everybody ! I have been trying to install the Graphviz package recently, though it ended up with an error precisely when all seemed to have been compiled successfully :-/ ... Making all in ming make[3]: Entering directory `/home/ncohen/.Sage/spkg/build/graphviz-2.16.1.p0/src/plu

[sage-devel] Re: Vote for including GLPK standard in Sage

2010-06-22 Thread Dr David Kirkby
On 21 June, 21:47, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: > On 06/21/10 07:45 PM, William Stein wrote: > > Tested on solaris? > > 32-bit Solaris 10 on SPARC - OK > 64-bit Solaris 10 on SPARC - OK > 32-bit OpenSolaris on x64 - OK > 64-bit OpenSolaris on x64 - OK > > In all cases, I just used 'configure' to t