On Oct 29, 6:48 pm, Mike Witt wrote:
> > Is there any chance of you making any of these machine which do *not*
> > run Fedora 13 available to the build bot? There are 5 machines which
> > the buildbot uses which runs Fedora 13, but nothing for Fedora 11, 12
> > or 14.
>
> Well, the one that
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> It seems that Mike Hansen had some pretty cool ideas about how to use that
> plugin.
There's some code at [1] which handles the digest authentication that
xmlrpclib doesn't handle by default. With the result of
"SageTracServerProxy", you can
On 10/29/10 8:22 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi Sage-Devel,
I'm curious if people are getting emails like this...
(I don't have anything to do with this PacktPub project. Generally, I think
it is best for people to write documentation for Sage that can be
distributed with Sage, and is organized u
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> On 10/29/10 10:10 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
>
>>> 'cksum' is a 32-bit checksum. Actually, if used all three sections of the
>>> output
>>>
>>> 1) Checksum
>>> 2) Length
>>> 3) Filen
On Oct 24, 1:52 am, David Kirkby wrote:
> It used to take about 1800 seconds to doctest Sage on my Sun Ultra 27
> which runs OpenSolaris. That has now dropped to about 1600 seconds in
> the latest version (4.6.rc0).
>
> I've not upgraded the hardware, compiler or other software, so I can't
> under
There was an interesting comment here about the question
of Python 2.8 and the smooth upgrade path. Apparently
the only Pythonic path is a 3.2 version.
http://sayspy.blogspot.com/2010/10/viewing-python-32-as-successor-to.html
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.co
On 30 October 2010 02:22, William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage-Devel,
> I'm curious if people are getting emails like this...
> (I don't have anything to do with this PacktPub project. Generally, I think
> it is best for people to write documentation for Sage that can be
> distributed with Sage, and is
Is there any chance of you making any of these machine which do *not*
run Fedora 13 available to the build bot? There are 5 machines which
the buildbot uses which runs Fedora 13, but nothing for Fedora 11, 12
or 14.
Well, the one that runs Fedora 13 is the one that has the worst
problems
Who the heck is this guy? There's no mention of Sage on his blog
http://www.shocksolution.com/about/
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:22 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage-Devel,
> I'm curious if people are getting emails like this...
> (I don't have anything to do with this PacktPub project. Generally
Hi Sage-Devel,
I'm curious if people are getting emails like this...
(I don't have anything to do with this PacktPub project. Generally, I think
it is best for people to write documentation for Sage that can be
distributed with Sage, and is organized using Sphinx, etc.)
Forwarded conversation
S
On 29 October 2010 16:48, rjf wrote:
> 3. The demand specifically for Mathematica programmers may reflect
> the fact that good recruiters are trying to find
> smart people who can pass their entrance exam,
> and assume that any competent person can learn to limp along in
> Mathematica fast, and
On 10/29/10 07:20 PM, Mike Witt wrote:
Is there any chance that Fedora 14 won't be supported?
It can't be fully supported until we have the hardware/software set up to test
it.
I have one FC11 machine, one FC12, and one FC13. FC12 has had no
problem with recent Sage builds. FC11 has had mino
On 10/30/10 12:57 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
I'm definitely in favor of adding ecl's test suite. Assuming that ecl
actually passes its self-tests ;)
Volker
Well, even if it does not, this will not stop Sage building, as the test suite
would only be run when SAGE_CHECK=yes.
It's 1 AM here, so I
I'm definitely in favor of adding ecl's test suite. Assuming that ecl
actually passes its self-tests ;)
Volker
On Oct 30, 12:37 am, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> There's no spkg-check file for ECL, so we can't run ECL's self-tests. In order
> to do this, we would need to add the tests, which are
There's no spkg-check file for ECL, so we can't run ECL's self-tests. In order
to do this, we would need to add the tests, which are in a sepparate file (1.7 MB).
I'd propose that we add
1) Add the ECL test code
2) Add an spkg-check file so ECL's self-tests can run if SAGE_CHECK=yes.
But of co
On 10/29/10 10:10 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
'cksum' is a 32-bit checksum. Actually, if used all three sections of the
output
1) Checksum
2) Length
3) Filename
I feel that should be sufficiently relieable. The probability of a test
having th
On 10/29/10 8:33 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
Hi there,
in light of the recent discussion on that our Trac based system shows its age
compared to more awesome technologies I figured I might try to automate a few
more steps of my own Trac interaction.
For me almost the most annoying thing is to
1)
I want to propose the following changes to the output format of find_fit
and solve:
for find_fit the current output format is a list of equations:
sage: data = [(i, 1.2 * sin(0.5*i-0.2) + 0.1 * normalvariate(0, 1)) for
i in xsrange(0, 4*pi, 0.2)]
sage: var('a, b, c, x')
sage: model(x) = a * s
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> On 10/25/10 07:06 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:19 AM, David Kirkby
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21 October 2010 01:33, David Roe wrote:
There are a number of tickets in trac about performance regressions
Is there any chance that Fedora 14 won't be supported?
I have one FC11 machine, one FC12, and one FC13. FC12 has had no
problem with recent Sage builds. FC11 has had minor problems. Even
though sage is supported on Fedora 13, *my* fc13 machine
(admittedly a rather underpowered one) promptly
cease
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2010-10-29 15:33, Martin Albrecht wrote:
>> Is there a better way of doing this (getting information about
>> a patch), e.g. is there a way to make Trac spit out some machine readable
>> format which is more easily parsed?
>
> I did this,
regarding jobs, programming, etc, Kirby does not reveal all that I
conveyed to him.
1. Monster.com has fewer jobs than indeed.com
Indeed.com now has 223 jobs listed, estimated salaries...
* $40,000+ (201)
* $60,000+ (152)
* $80,000+ (94)
* $100,000+ (39)
* $120,000+ (13)
Py
On 2010-10-29 15:33, Martin Albrecht wrote:
> Is there a better way of doing this (getting information about
> a patch), e.g. is there a way to make Trac spit out some machine readable
> format which is more easily parsed?
I did this, see
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/merger/pars
Are you in danger on reinventing the wheel?
John
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> in light of the recent discussion on that our Trac based system shows its age
> compared to more awesome technologies I figured I might try to automate a few
> more steps of m
I have made a new ticket at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10187
to update ecl and maxima simultaneously, as they depend on each other.
Updated spgks are there. Doctests for the now-smarter maxima still
need to be sorted out.
Fedora 14 also disallows executable stack libraries by defaul
Hi there,
in light of the recent discussion on that our Trac based system shows its age
compared to more awesome technologies I figured I might try to automate a few
more steps of my own Trac interaction.
For me almost the most annoying thing is to
1) export the patch
2) upload the patch (make
On 10/29/10 01:50 PM, kcrisman wrote:
I'm of the opinion that outside academia, there is not a lot of call for
Mathematica.
I think that in physics Mma is used fairly heavily, at least in
certain circles. I don't know how much of that is outside academia,
presumably a fair amount.
- kcrism
> I'm of the opinion that outside academia, there is not a lot of call for
> Mathematica.
>
I think that in physics Mma is used fairly heavily, at least in
certain circles. I don't know how much of that is outside academia,
presumably a fair amount.
- kcrisman
--
To post to this group, send a
Hi Victor!
On 28 Okt., 18:05, VictorMiller wrote:
> 3) Noncommutative polynomials and power series: if X is a finite set,
> and M is the free monoid on X (which is already in sage):
Few weeks ago I wrapped the functionality provided by GAP into Sage.
Advantages:
1) GAP also provides non-associat
Hi Jason, hi Mike,
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 03:26:09PM -0400, Jason Bandlow wrote:
> On 10/22/2010 12:20 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> > Given the difficulty of finding reviewers, are you arguing we
> > shouldn't try to make things even easier? Yes, it's not to bad ([copy
> > the url, qimpor
I have been hit by this too. For the same reason: my work desktop
has a networked (and backed up) home dir with limited space, but the
local disk has lots of space -- so I make ~/.cache a link to a dir on
the local disk and stopped getting warnings about my disk quota being
exceeded.
I'm sure yo
Hi
We had students learn to build and modify sage
on the large local "scratch space" on each PC, not on
their networked NFS home directories, which has more
limited space.
Each student had a ~/.cache/common-lisp which was
70M in size. Perhaps maxima compilation did this?
Perhaps it can be deleted
On 10/29/10 05:54 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi David,
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
If you want to put students off of using Mathematica, I can suggest a very
simple way. Suggest they look on job sites like phdjobs, monstir.com, and
search for the number of jobs requir
33 matches
Mail list logo
