My bad; I was thinking this because of Mathematica.
I should have said sequence and round brackets. Do you think the
distinction between lists and tuples is of any consequence in terms of
output? After all, their only difference is immutability.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-de
Hello,
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Eviatar wrote:
> I was wondering about people's opinions on typesetting lists in LaTeX
> with curly braces ({ }) instead of square brackets ([ ]) as is done in
> Python. This would be more mathematically correct, as sets are
> typically denoted like this in
Hello,
I was wondering about people's opinions on typesetting lists in LaTeX
with curly braces ({ }) instead of square brackets ([ ]) as is done in
Python. This would be more mathematically correct, as sets are
typically denoted like this in mathematics. I can't see it causing
much confusion, sinc
Thank you.
The numbers seem pretty standard. The biggest three universities are
the University of Toronto, British Columbia, and Montreal. I don't
think any Canadian university is using Sage significantly yet.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
On Sunday, January 9, 2011 12:48:57 AM UTC+1, Eviatar wrote:
>
> Could you please post the data for Canada?
biggest ISP: 5,023
university of toronto 1,798
university of british columbia 1,069
universite du quebec a montreal 1,002
and
universite du quebec 320
(same as above?)
university of waterl
I gave a talk about Sage at a workshop at Goettingen (gwdg.de) this fall,
focusing on Andrey's and my work on toric geometry.
See http://code.google.com/p/convex-singular/wiki/Organization2
The gwdg is a joint venture of the Goettingen University and the Max-Planck
Institute (http://www.gwdg.de
Could you please post the data for Canada?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://w
> On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 00:04, Harald Schilly
wrote:
> > christchurch college of education / 94
>
> ... and i found this for it:
> http://sage.math.canterbury.ac.nz/
>
> nice ;)
I know about that one. Haven't meet the guy yet (I now work at this
university).
Did I go 27 times to the web site f
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 00:04, Harald Schilly wrote:
> christchurch college of education / 94
... and i found this for it:
http://sage.math.canterbury.ac.nz/
nice ;)
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-dev
On Saturday, January 8, 2011 11:35:58 PM UTC+1, François wrote:
>
> data from new zealand (where I reside)
Well, you know, the data is just what a "whois" for an IP says. I just say
that there is a strong correlation to a university, if there is the actual
name of it in the whois entry ;)
For
Out of curiosity could I have access to data from new zealand (where I reside)
to see who besides me is active here.
Francois
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more
Because the list of "interesting" ISPs for UK got some attention, here a
selection for Germany: (range: entire 2010, the numbers are visits, that
means some unique computer has accessed one or more pages)
To give you a comparison, the top 1 number for Germany's biggest ISP is
32,343, the second
Well, i know it is hard to do it in a completely general settings. But
at least i would like to do something that can handle the cases that
usually appear in high-school or first years of college. Even if
specially complicated cases would raaise an error, i think that having
something that works fo
> 1. What release should be the target against which a patch should be
> checked before it is uploaded to the Trac for review? Is it the latest
> publicly released version OR one of the release candidates?
>
Most of the time the code doesn't change to much between two releases,
you just got unlu
I found sage-release. Never mind the second question.
Kwankyu
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sag
Hi,
As an occasional developer for Sage, I have a question regarding to
what should be the target release of Sage for a patch. This question
arose to me at least twice.
I wrote and uploaded a patch for the latest release, 4.6, of Sage.
Then a reviewer said the patch is not applied cleanly to the
On 8 led, 12:12, mmarco wrote:
> Hi
>
> One of the skills that is studied in high-school and college is to
> compute the domain of a real function of real variable given by a
> formula.
>
> I haven't seen that implented in sage, so i plan to do so.
Hi, I wish you success, but I think that this is
> > So one could strip 640MB away from SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/build/sage and
> > still have a Sage that runs.
size -30% with almost no loss of functionality!
> > SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/build/sage.
> > The autogenerated C/C++ files are not there, so development ("sage
> > -br") would be painfully slo
Hi
One of the skills that is studied in high-school and college is to
compute the domain of a real function of real variable given by a
formula.
I haven't seen that implented in sage, so i plan to do so.
In ordxer to do that, i would need some way to represent real
intervals (maybe with enpoints
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:54 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:55 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 1:37 PM, emil wrote:
On Jan 7, 4:18 pm, William Stein wrote:
> The best soluti
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:55 PM, William Stein wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 1:37 PM, emil wrote:
> >>> On Jan 7, 4:18 pm, William Stein wrote:
> The best solution to the problem we're discussing in the context of
> >>>
21 matches
Mail list logo
