On Feb 3, 2:34 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:22 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
> >> > It sounds quite ominous.
>
> >> I thought the exact same thing. Very unimpressed.
>
> > Though keep in mind it's probably a first draft.
>
> I would say that it's primarily a sounding board for
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Emil Widmann wrote:
>
> On Feb 3, 3:22 pm, kcrisman wrote:
>> > > It sounds quite ominous.
>>
>> > I thought the exact same thing. Very unimpressed.
>>
>> Though keep in mind it's probably a first draft.
>
>
> For veteran contributors the opaque (but I'm sure it w
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:22 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>> > It sounds quite ominous.
>>
>> I thought the exact same thing. Very unimpressed.
>>
>
> Though keep in mind it's probably a first draft.
I would say that it's primarily a sounding board for the BDFL for when
executive decisions need to be mad
On Feb 3, 3:22 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> > > It sounds quite ominous.
>
> > I thought the exact same thing. Very unimpressed.
>
> Though keep in mind it's probably a first draft.
For veteran contributors the opaque (but I'm sure it will improve)
policy of access to the steering committee might soun
We must move this discussion to sage-flame. Sorry, this is a serious
waste of bandwidth.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:08 AM, rjf wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 3, 6:37 am, "Dr. David Kirkby"
>> > It sounds quite ominous.
>>
>> I thought the exact same thing. Very unimpressed.
>>
>
> You could always organize
On Feb 3, 6:37 am, "Dr. David Kirkby"
> > It sounds quite ominous.
>
> I thought the exact same thing. Very unimpressed.
>
You could always organize a fork of the project, and do
your own favorite things.:)
RJF
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscri
William Stein writes:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
>> Robert Bradshaw writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
>>> wrote:
and those changes get put into Sage, without any discussion
of what's actually needed in Sage, and what sh
> > It sounds quite ominous.
>
> I thought the exact same thing. Very unimpressed.
>
Though keep in mind it's probably a first draft.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
On 02/ 3/11 02:07 PM, kcrisman wrote:
I've updated the page:http://www.sagemath.org/jsage/
andhttp://www.sagemath.org/jsage/editors.html
Thanks. Wow, this is very different from what JSage used to be, at
least in theory.
I've no idea how it used to be.
It sounds quite ominous.
I
On 2011-02-03 15:02, Volker Braun wrote:
> Use "make distclean" to evict every file than doesn't pay rent. The next
> "make" will compile everything from scratch.
This might be true, but I still agree with Dima that "make clean" should
also clean all spkgs.
--
To post to this group, send an emai
On 02/ 2/11 04:50 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
On Wednesday, February 2, 2011 3:55:27 PM UTC, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
There is never any point in setting SAGE64=no. [...] ONLY if it is set
to "yes" will anything different happen. That is usually adding the
compiler flag "-m64", though in some cases
On Feb 3, 4:29 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:21 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
> >>> A steering committee might be a good idea, we have JSage which
> >>> somewhat fulfills this role.
>
> >> ???
>
> >> You don't mean th
Use "make distclean" to evict every file than doesn't pay rent. The next
"make" will compile everything from scratch.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options,
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:21 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> A steering committee might be a good idea, we have JSage which
>>> somewhat fulfills this role.
>>
>> ???
>>
>> You don't mean the fantastically outdated
>> http://www.sagemath.org
14 matches
Mail list logo
